Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
15
Cyril Bibby, “Thomas Henry Huxley and University Development,”
Victorian
Studies
2 (1958): 107.
16
Bibby, “University Development,” 98.
17
Huxley to Henrietta Heathhorn, March 1851, in
Life and Letters
, 1:72.
18
Ben-David,
Scientist's Role
, 89-94, 102-3, 126-29.
19
Desmond,
Huxley
, 185-87; White,
Man of Science
, 72-73; Thomas H. Huxley,
“Science,”
Westminster Review
5 (1854): 254-57.
20
White,
Man of Science
, 69-75.
21
George Eliot to George Combe, November 28, 1853, in
The George Eliot Let-
ters
, ed. Gordon Haight (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1954),
8:89-90 (emphasis in original).
22
Huxley, “Darwinian Hypothesis,” 20.
23
Lester Kurtz,
The Politics of Heresy: The Modernist Crisis in Roman Catholicism
(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986); Kai Erikson,
Wayward Puri-
tans: A Study in the Sociology of Deviance
(New York: John Wiley, 1966).
24
T. R. Wright,
The Religion of Humanity: The Impact of Comtean Positivism on
Victorian Britain
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), 1, 273.
25
Thomas H. Huxley, “The Scientific Aspects of Positivism,” in
Lay Sermons,
Addresses, and Reviews
(New York: Appleton, 1871), 147.
26
Desmond,
Huxley
, 193; Eliot to John Chapman, December 17, 1853, in
Eliot
Letters
, 2:132-33. Lewes' response was published in
Leader
, January 14, 1854,
40.
27
Huxley to Charles Kingsley, April 12, 1869, in
Life and Letters
,
1:323.
28
Desmond,
Huxley
, 487-88, 625-28.
29
Charles Kingsley to F. D. Maurice, October 23, 1868, in
Charles Kingsley:
His
Letters and Memories of His Life
, ed. Frances E. Kingsley (London: Henry King,
1877), 2:214.
30
Kingsley to Dr. Rigg, May 16, 1871, in
Letters and Memories
,
2:367.
31
See Desmond,
Huxley
, 373; and George Eliot to Frederic Harrison, January
5, 1866, in
Eliot Letters
, 4:214-15. Huxley, of course, was not always adverse
to such arguments himself. See, for instance, his “On the Advisableness of
Improving Natural Knowledge,” in
Methods and Results
, 18 -41.
32
Eisen, “Huxley and the Positivists,” 343.
33
Thomas H. Huxley, “Science and Culture,” in
Science and Education: Essays
,
vol. 3 of
Selected Works of Thomas H. Huxley
(New York: Appleton, 1893), 155.
34
Robert Gilpin, “The Atlantic Imbalance in Science and Technology,” in
Com-
parative Studies in Science and Society
, ed. Sal Restivo and Christopher Vander-
pool (Columbus, Ohio: Merill, 1974), 289-305.
35
Thomas Gieryn's case study, in fact, revolves around the similar messages of
