Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
are monotone with respect to the inclusion relation between
condition attribute sets. Namely, for B
l A (
u
)
and u A (
u
)
,
A
C and u
U ,wehave
B
A
l B (
u
)
l A (
u
),
u B (
u
)
u A (
u
).
(7.43)
V d , using the generalized decision function, the lower and upper approx-
imations of unions are represented as:
Let i
X i
X i
LA A (
) ={
u
U
|
l A (
u
)
i
} ,
UA A (
) ={
u
U
|
u A (
u
)
i
} ,
(7.44)
X i
X i
LA A (
) ={
u
U
|
u A (
u
)
i
} ,
UA A (
) ={
u
U
|
l A (
u
)
i
} .
(7.45)
We can represent approximations of classes using the generalized decision,
LA A (
X i ) ={
u
U
|
l A (
u
) =
u A (
u
) =
i
} ,
(7.46)
UA A (
X i ) ={
u
U
|
l A (
u
)
i
u A (
u
) } ,
(7.47)
BN A (
X i ) = {
u
U
|
l A (
u
)
i
u A (
u
),
l A (
u
)<
u A (
u
) } .
(7.48)
Example 12 Remember the decision table
D = (
U
,
C
∪{
d
} , {
V a } )
in Table 7.7 .Let
A
=
{Ma, Ph}. The generalized decision function
ʴ A with respect to A is obtained
as follows:
ʴ A (
u 1 ) =
,
A (
u 2 ) =
,
A (
u 3 ) =
,
,
med
good
med
good
med
good
ʴ A (
u 4 ) =
med
,
med
A (
u 5 ) =
bad
,
med
A (
u 6 ) =
bad
,
med
,
ʴ A (
u 7 ) =
bad
,
bad
.
7.4.2 Structure-Based Reducts in Dominance-Based
Rough Set Models
Before defining structure-based reducts in DRSM, we introduce a notion of reducts
preserving the quality of sorting, proposed by Susmaga et al. [ 49 ]. For A
C ,the
quality of sorting
, which is the counterpart of the quality of classification in
the classical RSM, is defined by:
ʳ A (
d
)
i V d BN A (
i V d BN A (
X i
X i
) = |
U
) |
= |
U
) |
ʳ A (
d
.
|
U
|
|
U
|
By ( 7.34 ) and ( 7.40 ), we can see that
ʳ A (
d
)
is related to the positive region of DRSM,
i V d BN A (
i V d BN A (
X i
) = |
U
) |
= |
U
X i ) |
= |
POS A (
d
) |
ʳ A (
d
.
|
U
|
|
U
|
|
U
|
We call this type of reducts Q-reducts.
 
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search