Weighting of Features by Sequential Selection - Feature Selection for Data and Pattern Recognition - page 87

21. Kavzoglu, T., Mather, P.: Assessing artificial neural network pruning algorithms. In: Proceed-
ings of the 24thAnnual Conference and Exhibition of the Remote Sensing Society, pp. 603-609.
Greenwich (2011)
22. Khmelev, D., Tweedie, F.: Using Markov chains for identification of writers. Lit. Linguist.
Comput. 16 (4), 299-307 (2001)
23. Kingston, G., Maier, H., Lambert, M.: A statistical input pruning method for artificial neural
networks used in environmental modelling. In: Transactions of the 2nd Biennial Meeting of the
International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, pp. 87-92. Osnabrueck (2004)
24. Liu, H., Motoda, H.: Computational Methods of Feature Selection. Chapman & Hall/CRC,
Boca Raton (2008)
25. Lynam, T., Clarke, C., Cormack, G.: Information extraction with term frequencies. In: Pro-
ceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference, pp. 1-4. San Diego (2001)
26. Moshkov, M., Piliszczuk, M., Zielosko, B.: On partial covers, reducts and decision rules with
weights. Trans. Rough Sets 6 , 211-246 (2006)
27. Moshkow, M., Skowron, A., Suraj, Z.: On covering attribute sets by reducts. In: Kryszkiewicz,
M., Peters, J., Rybinski, H., Skowron, A. (eds.) Rough Sets and Emerging Intelligent Systems
Paradigms. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4585, pp. 175-180. Springer, Berlin (2007)
28. Munro, R.: A Queing-theory model of word frequency distributions. In: Proceedings of the 1st
Australasian Language Technology Workshop, pp. 1-8. Melbourne (2003)
29. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. Int. J. Comput. Inform. Sci. 11 (5), 341-356 (1982)
30. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets and intelligent data analysis. Inf. Sci. 147 , 1-12 (2002)
31. Peng, R.: Statistical aspects of literary style. Bachelor's Thesis, Yale University (1999)
32. Peng, R., Hengartner, H.: Quantitative analysis of literary styles. Am. Stat. 56 (3), 15-38 (2002)
33. Shen, Q.: Rough feature selection for intelligent classifiers. Trans. Rough Sets 7 , 244-255
(2006)
34. Sikora, M.: Rule quality measures in creation and reduction of data rule models. In: Greco,
S., Hata, Y., Hirano, S., Inuiguchi, M., Miyamoto, S., Nguyen, H., Słowi nski, R. (eds.) Rough
Sets and Current Trends in Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4259, pp.
716-725. Springer (2006)
35. Słowi nski, R., Greco, S., Matarazzo, B.: Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach to Reasoning
About Ordinal Data. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4585, pp. 5-11 (2007)
36. Stanczyk, U.: Relative reduct-based selection of features for ANN classifier. In: Cyran, K.,
Kozielski, S., Peters, J., Stanczyk, U., Wakulicz-Deja, A. (eds.) Man-Machine Interactions.
AISC, vol. 59, pp. 335-344. Springer, Berlin (2009)
37. Stanczyk, U.: DRSA decision algorithm analysis in stylometric processing of literary texts.
In: Szczuka, M., Kryszkiewicz, M., Ramanna, S., Jensen, R., Hu, Q. (eds.) Rough Sets and
Current Trends in Computing. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6086, pp. 600-609. Springer, Berlin (2010)
38. Stanczyk, U.: Reduct-based analysis of decision algorithms: application in computational styl-
istics. In: Corchado, M., Kurzynski, E., Wozniak, M.(eds.) Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Sys-
tems. Part 2. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6679, pp. 295-302. Springer (2011)
39. Stanczyk, U.: Rule-based approach to computational stylistics. In: Bouvry, P., Kłopotek, M.,
Marciniak, M., Mykowiecka, A., Rybi nski, H. (eds.) Security and Intelligent Information Sys-
tems. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7053, pp. 168-179. Springer, Berlin (2012)
40. Stanczyk, U.: On preference order of DRSA conditional attributes for computational stylis-
tics. In: Decker, H., Lhotska, L., Link, S., Tjoa, B.J,A. (eds.) Database and Expert Systems
Applications. LNCS, pp. 26-33. Springer, Berlin (2013)
41. Stanczyk, U.: Relative reduct-based estimation of relevance for stylometric features. In: Cata-
nia, B., Guerrini, G., Pokorny, J. (eds.) Advances inDatabases and Information Systems. LNCS,
vol. 8133, pp. 135-147. Springer, Berlin (2013)
42. Waugh, S., Adams, A., Tweedie, F.: Computational stylistics using artificial neural networks.
Lit. Linguist. Comput. 15 (2), 187-198 (2000)