Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
of individual writing styles by referring to such linguistic features which betray
individual preferences and are employed rather subconsciously. Lexical and syntac-
tic descriptors exploited enable definition of individual styles and categorisation of
texts by their authors.
References
1. Ahonen, H., Heinonen, O., Klemettinen, M., Verkamo, A.: Applying data mining techniques
in text analysis. Technical Report C-1997-23, Department of Computer Science, University of
Helsinki, Finland (1997)
2. Argamon, S., Burns, K., Dubnov, S. (eds.): The Structure of Style: Algorithmic Approaches to
Understanding Manner and Meaning. Springer, Berlin (2010)
3. Argamon, S., Karlgren, J., Shanahan, J.: Stylistic analysis of text for information access. In:
Proceedings of the 28th International ACM Conference on Research and Development in
Information Retrieval, Brazil (2005)
4. Baayen, H., van Haltern, H., Tweedie, F.: Outside the cave of shadows: using syntactic anno-
tation to enhance authorship attribution. Lit. Linguist. Comput. 11 (3), 121-132 (1996)
5. Bayardo Jr., R., Agrawal, R.: Mining the most interesting rules. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM
SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 145-154
(1999)
6. Berber Sardinha, T.: Using key words in text analysis: practical aspects (1999). Available
on-line from ftp://ftp.liv.ac.uk/pub/linguistics
7. Burrows, J.: Textual analysis. In: Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., Unsworth, J. (eds.) ACompanion
to Digital Humanities. Blackwell, Oxford (2004)
8. Craig, H.: Stylistic analysis and authorship studies. In: Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., Unsworth,
J. (eds.) A Companion to Digital Humanities. Blackwell, Oxford (2004)
9. Dash, M., Liu, H.: Feature selection for classification. Intell. Data Anal. 1 , 131-156 (1997)
10. Dash, M., Liu, H.: Consistency-based search in feature selection. Artif. Intell. 151 , 155-176
(2003)
11. Fiesler, E., Beale, R.: Handbook of Neural Computation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
(1997)
12. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowi nski, R.: Advances in multiple criteria decision making. In:
Gal, T., Hanne, T., Stewart, T. (eds.) The Use of Rough Sets and Fuzzy Sets in Multi Criteria
Decision Making Chap. 14, pp. 14.1-14.59. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1999)
13. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowi nski, R.: Rough set theory for multicriteria decision analysis.
Eur. J. Oper. Res. 129 (1), 1-47 (2001)
14. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowi nski, R.: Dominance-based rough set approach as a proper way
of handling graduality in rough set theory. Trans. Rough Sets 7 , 36-52 (2007)
15. Greco, S., Słowi nski, R., Stefanowski, J.: Evaluating importance of conditions in the set of
discovered rules. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. 4482 , 314-321 (2007)
16. Greco, S., Słowi nski, R., Stefanowski, J., Zurawski, M.: Incremental versus non-incremental
rule induction for multicriteria classification. Trans. Rough Sets 2 , 33-53 (2004)
17. Guyon, I., Elisseeff, A.: An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res.
3 , 1157-1182 (2003)
18. Jelonek, J., Krawiec, K., Stefanowski, J.: Comparative study of feature subset selection tech-
niques for machine learning tasks. In: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Intelligent Infor-
mation Systems (1998)
19. Jensen, R., Shen, Q.: Computational Intelligence and Feature Selection. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)
20. John, G., Kohavi, R., Pfleger, K.: Irrelevant features and the subset selection problem. In: Cohen,
W., Hirsh, H. (eds.) Machine Learning: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference, pp.
121-129. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers (1994)
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search