Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 2.8. Survival of seedlings emerging in maize in July from establishment to
maturity (or for some A.theophrasti, death by hard frost)
Species
Year
Till
No-till
Rye
Till
Rye
No-till
Amaranthus retroflexus
1986
0.27
0.44
0.25
0.46
1987
0.33
0.55
0.20
0.55
1991
0.78
0.82
1992
0.58
0.49
Chenopodium album
1986
0
0
0.15
0
1987
0.61
0.41
0.43
0.33
Portulaca oleracea
1986
0
0.04
0
0
1987
0.31
Digitaria sanguinalis
1986
0.81
0.58
1987
0.84
0.79
1991
0.78
0.70
1992
0.60
0.16
Abutilon theophrasti
1991
0.94
0.96
1992
0.63
0.48
Notes:
No comparisons were significant except for till vs.no-till for A.retroflexus in 1986 and 1987, C.
album in 1987,and D.sanguinalis in 1992.
Source : Data for 1986 and 1987 from Mohler & Callaway (1992); data for 1991 and 1992 from C.L.
Mohler (unpublished).
Drought occasionally causes substantial mortality during the growth
phase in some weed populations (Blackman & Templeman, 1938), but based
on the several studies cited above, it does not appear to be a major limiting
factor for most annual weeds. Usually drought will have greatest effect on
population size during establishment rather than during growth and matura-
tion. Once the weed has a well-established root system, a drought that kills
many weeds is likely to severely damage the crop as well.
For introduced weed species,the low mortality rates may be partially due to
escape from host-specific natural enemies.However,even in their native range
most annual agricultural weeds probably escape serious attack because they
represent unpredictable and ephemeral resources (Feeny,1976).Crop rotation
and year-to-year variation in the success of weed control practices create large
fluctuations in the density of particular weed species.Moreover,weed popula-
tions tend to be patchy (e.g.,Wilson & Brain,1991; Cardina,Sparrow & McCoy,
1996), and because they are usually mixed in with a larger population of a
more dominant plant species, namely the crop, they are probably hard for
host-specific herbivores to locate (Root, 1973). In an exceptional case,
monarch butterfly larvae defoliated 31% to 78% of young Asclepias syriaca in
soybean in Minnesota (Yenish et al ., 1997). However, defoliation by monarch
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search