Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
in discussions about the philosophical aspects of their work, because by doing
so we may come closer to an understanding (and perhaps a theory) of living
systems. We are convinced that it will be necessary to view living systems from
different perspectives in comparison to the perspectives physicists use to study
complex systems in chemistry and physics; many of the reasons for this claim
have been discussed in this topic. One way to discusss those perspectives, their
consequences, and relationships with evolutionary, molecular, and developmen-
tal biology is to engage in the philosophy of systems biology. We hope that
many of you will do so. Systems biology is here to stay. Its aim is to offer
an understanding of how molecular systems can be alive, which is the ultimate
aim of biology. This is the challenge that systems biology and its philosophy is
facing and currently taking up. We hope that this topic has contributed to the
development of systems biology.
REFERENCES
Alberghina L & Westerhoff HV, Eds. Systems Biology: Definitions and Perspectives. (Topics in
Current Genetics), Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co., 2005.
Alon U. An introduction to systems biology . Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2006.
Atkinson DE. Cellular energy metabolism and its regulation . Academic press, 1977.
Bakker BM, Mensonides FIC, Teusink B, van Hoek P, Michels PAM & Westerhoff HV. Com-
partmentation protects trypanosomes from the dangerous design of glycolysis . Proceedings
of the National Acadamy of Sciences USA: 97(5), 2087-2092, 2000.
Bechtel W& Richardson RC. Discovering complexity: decomposition and localization as strategies
in scientific explanation . Princeton university press, 1993.
Cartwright N. How the laws of physics lie . Oxford University Press, 1983.
Chance B, Garfinkel D, Higgins J & Hess B. Metabolic control mechanisms. 5. A solution for the
equations representing interaction between glycolysis and respiration in ascites tumor cells.
Journal of Biological Chemistry: 235, 2426-39, 1960.
Glansdorff P & Prigogine I. Thermodynamic theory of structure, stability, and fluctuations .
New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1971.
Goldbeter A & Lefever R. Dissipative structures for an allosteric model - application to glycolytic
oscillations . Biophysical Journal: 12(10), 1302-1315, 1972.
Goodwin BC. Oscillatory behavior in enzymatic control processes . Advances in Enzyme
Regulation: 3, 425-38, 1965.
Heinrich R & Rapoport TA. A linear steady-state treatment of enzymatic chains. General proper-
ties, control and effector strength . European Journal of Biochemistry: 42(1), 89-95, 1974.
Hodgkin AL & Huxley AF. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application
to conduction and excitation in nerve . Journal of Physiology: 117(4): 500-44, 1952.
Hull DL & Ruse M, Eds. The philosophy of biology . Oxford university press, 1998.
Kacser H & Burns JA. The control of flux . Symposium Society Experimental Biology: 27, 65-104,
1973.
Kauffman S. Gene regulation networks: a theory for their global structure and behaviors . Current
Topics in Developmental Biology: 6(6), 145-82, 1971.
Kholodenko BN & Westerhoff HV, Eds. Metabolic Engineering in the Post Genomic Era. Horizon
Bioscience S, Bios Scientific Publishers Ltd, 2004.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search