Database Reference
In-Depth Information
22. Levin, R., Redell, D.D.: An evaluation of the ninth SOSP submissions; or, how
(and how not) to write a good systems paper. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems
Review 17(3), 35-40 (1983),
http://www.usenix.org/events/samples/submit/advice.html
23. MacEachren, A., Dai, X., Hardisty, F., Guo, D., Lengerich, G.: Exploring high-D
spaces with multiform matrices and small multiples. In: Proc. IEEE Symposium
on Information Visualization (InfoVis), pp. 31-38 (2003)
24. Mackinlay, J.D.: Automating the Design of Graphical Presentations of Relational
Information. ACM Trans. on Graphics (TOG) 5(2), 111-141 (1986)
25. Munzner, T.: Drawing large graphs with H3Viewer and Site Manager. In: White-
sides, S.H. (ed.) GD 1998. LNCS, vol. 1547, pp. 384-393. Springer, Heidelberg
(1999)
26. Munzner, T., Burchard, P.: Visualizing the structure of the world wide web in
3D hyperbolic space. In: Proc. Virtual Reality Modelling Language Symposium
(VRML), pp. 33-38. ACM SIGGRAPH (1995)
27. Nielsen, J.: Guerrilla HCI: Using discount usability engineering to penetrate the
intimidation barrier. In: Bias, R.G., Mayhew, D.J. (eds.) Cost-justifying usability,
pp. 245-272. Academic Press, London (1994)
28. Partridge, C.: How to increase the chances your paper is accepted at ACM
SIGCOMM. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 28(3) (1998),
http://www.sigcomm.org/conference-misc/author-guide.html
29. Plaisant, C.: The challenge of information visualization evaluation. In: Proc. Ad-
vanced Visual Interfaces (AVI), pp. 109-116 (2004)
30. Plumlee, M., Ware, C.: Zooming versus multiple window interfaces: Cognitive
costs of visual comparisons. Proc. ACM Trans. on Computer-Human Interaction
(ToCHI) 13(2), 179-209 (2006)
31. Pousman, Z., Stasko, J.T., Mateas, M.: Casual information visualization: Depic-
tions of data in everyday life. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics
(TVCG) (Proc. InfoVis 07) 13(6), 1145-1152 (2007)
32. Rogowitz, B.E., Treinish, L.A.: How not to lie with visualization. Computers In
Physics 10(3), 268-273 (1996),
http://www.research.ibm.com/dx/proceedings/pravda/truevis.htm
33. Shaw, M.: Mini-tutorial: Writing good software engineering research papers.
In: Proc. Intl. Conf. on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 726-736 (2003),
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/
~
Compose/shaw-icse03.pdf
34. Shewchuk, J.: Three sins of authors in computer science and math (1997),
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/jrs/sins.html
35. Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C.: Strategies for evaluating information visualization
tools: Multi-dimensional in-depth long-term case studies. In: Proc. AVI Workshop
on BEyond time and errors: novel evaLuation methods for Information Visualiza-
tion (BELIV), pp. 38-43 (2006)
36. Smallman, H.S., John, M.S., Oonk, H.M., Cowen, M.B.: Information availability in
2D and 3D displays. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications (CG&A) 21(5),
51-57 (2001)
37. Tang, D., Stolte, C., Bosch, R.: Design choices when architecting visualizations.
Information Visualization 3(2), 65-79 (2004)
38. Tory, M., Kirkpatrick, A.E., Atkins, M.S., Moller, T.: Visualization task perfor-
mance with 2D, 3D, and combination displays. IEEE Trans. Visualization and
Computer Graphics (TVCG) 12(1), 2-13 (2006)
Search WWH ::
Custom Search