Database Reference
In-Depth Information
or points of view we may find distasteful, and any communication medium that
is suciently powerful to inform may also be used to lie or misrepresent. We
as a community should not be so concerned with trying to control the medium
or prevent people from lying or creating bad visualizations. As audiences get
more comfortable communicating with visualizations, we optimistically expect
the quality of visualizations and nuance of interpretation to improve.
However, this proscription does not mean that researchers should idly sit on
their hands. Rather, there will be an expanded role for visualization experts to
play. Issues of data provenance, cleaning, and integrity will force the research
community to focus on the visualization pipeline in a more holistic manner.
Supporting data at varied levels of structure will become increasingly necessary.
New genres of visualization use may require new designs and new systems to
support emerging practices, and the design of visual exploration tools that both
empower and educate will take on new importance. Consequently, the entrance
of visualization technologies into the mainstream offers a new horizon of research
opportunities.
References
1. Agrawala, M., Beers, A.C., McDowall, I., Frohlich, B., Bolas, M., Hanrahan, P.:
The Two-User Responsive Workbench: Support for Collaboration Through In-
dividual Views of a Shared Space. In: International Conference on Computer
Graphics and Interactive Techniques (Siggraph '97), pp. 327-332. ACM Press,
New York (1997), doi:10.1145/258734.258875
2. Ahlberg, C., Wistrand, E.: IVEE: An information visualization & exploration
environment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualiza-
tion, Atlanta, GA, October 1995, pp. 66-73. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los
Alamitos (1995)
3. Anupam, V., Bajaj, C.L., Schikore, D., Shikore, M.: Representations in distributed
cognitive tasks. IEEE Computer 27(7), 37-43 (1994)
4. Artero, A.O., Ferreira de Oliveira, M.C., Levkowitz, H.: Uncovering clusters in
crowded parallel coordinates visualizations. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Sympo-
sium on Information Visualization (InfoVis), pp. 81-88. IEEE Computer Society
Press, Los Alamitos (2004)
5. Baldonado, M.Q.W., Woodruff, A., Kuchinsky, A.: Guidelines for using multiple
views in information visualization. In: Proceedings of AVI '00, pp. 110-119. ACM
Press, New York (2000), doi:10.1145/345513.345271
6. Benbunan-Fich, R., Hiltz, S.R., Turoff, M.: A comparative content analysis of face-
to-face vs. asynchronous group decision making. Decision Support Systems 34(4),
457-469 (2003)
7. Benkler, Y.: Coase's penguin, or, linux and the nature of the firm. Yale Law
Journal 112(369) (2002)
8. Benko, H., Wilson, A.D., Baudisch, P.: Precise Selection Techniques for Multi-
Touch Screens. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Comput-
ing Systems (CHI'06), Montreal, Canada, April 22-27, 2006, pp. 1263-1272. ACM
Press, New York (2006), doi:10.1145/1124772.1124963
9. Benko, H., Ishak, E.W., Feiner, S.: Collaborative mixed reality visualization of
an archaeological excavation. In: IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and
Augmented Reality (ISMAR 2004), Arlington, VA, pp. 132-140 (2004)
Search WWH ::
Custom Search