Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Figure 11.9.
Filling of the coronal cavity with Fuji II®
In this case involving a juxta-gingival buccal lesion, RMGIC was
the appropriate procedure. Admittedly, a composite restoration could
have been carried out as the operative field could be established.
However, the protocol for a composite is more time consuming and
this material does not release fluoride.
11.5. Conclusion
The principal characteristics of glass ionomers include the ability
to adhere naturally to enamel and dentin, the cariostatic effect of
fluoride release and the moisture tolerance. They are therefore
particularly worthwhile materials for use in challenging situations
when isolation is impossible to obtain or for clinical situations
concerning uncooperative children. In this regard, either an RMGIC or
an HVGIC would be used when mechanical stress will be high.
11.6. Bibliography
[ANT 87] A
NTONUCCI
J.M., “Formulation and evaluation of resin modified
glass ionomer cements”,
Transactions of the 13th Annual Meeting
,
Society of Biomaterials, New York, 1987.
[BRA 96] B
RAUN
S., H
NAT
W.P., F
REUDENTHALER
J.W.,
et al.
, “A study of
maximum bite force during growth and development”,
The Angle
Orthodontist
, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 261-264, 1996.
