Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
1500
N/mm
2
1000
700
500
R
o
N/mm
2
400
1570
300
1770
Unterberg (1967)
1960
1570
Matsukawa et al
(1988)
Birkenmaier (1980)
Dillmann and
Gabriel (1982)
200
1770
1670
1470
1670
100
5mm
6
7
0
1
2
3
wire diameter
ʴ
4
Fig. 1.15 Repetitive tensile strength for different wire diameters d for a mean nominal tensile
strength R
0
= 1,720 N/mm
2
strength amplitude according to (
1.3a
) although there the stress gradient is 0.
Because of this and also as a result of other observations, Unterberg (
1967
) stated
that the theory of stress gradient does not exist for rope wires.
In Fig.
1.15
the influence of the wire diameter d is shown using the results from
different authors. In this figure the mean repetitive fatigue strength r
t
;
Rep
¼
2
r
t
;
A
is used. As a reminder, repetitive strength means that the middle stress is
r
t,m
= r
t,A
and the lower stress is 0. As an equation using the results in Fig.
1.15
,
the repetitive strength is expressed as
r
t
;
Rep
¼
2
r
t
;
A
ð
r
lower
¼
0
Þ¼
1,200
e
0
:
122
d
:
ð
1
:
3b
Þ
The influence of the other size parameter, the stressed wire length l, can be
evaluated for the fatigue strength amplitude in the same way as for a number of
load cycles N if the standard deviation of the fatigue strength amplitude for one
and the same wire were known.
The influence of the tensile strength R
m
on the rotary bending strength r
Rot
is
shown in Fig.
1.16
from Wolf (
1987
). In this diagram, Wolf put in the results
gained by Buchholz (
1965
) wires with lower tensile strength to get an overview for
a greater strength range. For small tensile strengths, the rotary bending strength
increases almost proportionally with tensile strength R
m
. The rotary bending
strength does not increase as much for rope wires (wires with tensile strength
between 1,300 and 2,200 N/mm
2
). According to Wolf (
1987
), it is
Search WWH ::
Custom Search