Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
a i
n
+ a j
a i a j
1
2
= n +
i
=
1 ,j
=
1
i
=
j
n
2
× 2 = n + n 2
n = n 2
n +
Therefore, according to Equation 7.23 and Inequation 7.24,
n
1
n 2
σ η C
σ η i C
(7.26)
i
=
1
The single classifier developed by MuSeRA/REA is based on the big picture
of the training data chunk augmented by the previous minority class examples,
while the single classifier developed by UB is based on a partial view. Thus, it
is valid that the error rate of the base hypothesis h i created by MuSeRA/REA
should be equal to or less than that created by UB, that is,
σ η i C
σ b i
(7.27)
which naturally leads to the same result regarding the comparison between their
averaged error rates, that is,
n
k
1
n
1
k
σ η i C
σ b i
(7.28)
i
=
1
j
=
1
Given the arrival of sufficient training data chunks, it is inevitable that n>k ;
thus,
k 2
n
1
n 2
1
k 2
σ η i C
σ b i
(7.29)
i
=
1
j
=
1
On the basis of Equations 7.18, 7.26, and 7.29, there is
σ η C
σ b E
(7.30)
which proves that MuSeRA / REA can provide less erroneous prediction results
than UB.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search