Large-Scale RDF Processing with MapReduce - Large Scale and Big Data: Processing and Management - page 179

our approach did not require any changes to Hadoop and HBase at all. Consequently,
MAPSIN joins could be run on any existing Hadoop infrastructure and also on an
instance of Amazon's Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) without additional installation
or management overhead.
REFERENCES
1. Manola, F., Miller, E., McBride, B.: RDF Primer. W3C Recom. Available at http://www.
w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/ (2004).
2. Prud'hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A.: SPARQL Query Language for RDF. W3C Recom.
Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/ (2008).
3. Huang, J., Abadi, D.J., Ren, K.: Scalable SPARQL Querying of Large RDF Graphs.
PVLDB 4(11), 1123-1134 (2011).
4. Dean, J., Ghemawat, S.: MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters.
Commun. ACM 51(1), 107-113 (2008).
5. White, T.: Hadoop—The Definitive Guide: Storage and Analysis at Internet Scale (2nd
ed.). O'Reilly (2011) Sebastopol (CA, USA).
6. Harth, A., Umbrich, J., Hogan, A., Decker, S.: YARS2: A Federated Repository for
Querying Graph Structured Data from the Web. Semantic Web 4825, 211-224 (2007).
7. Harris, S., Lamb, N., Shadbolt, N.: 4store: The Design and Implementation of a
Clustered RDF Store. In: SSWS , pp. 94-109 (2009).
8. Olston, C., Reed, B., Srivastava, U., Kumar, R., Tomkins, A.: Pig Latin: A Not-So-Foreign
Language for Data Processing. In: Proc. SIGMOD , pp. 1099-1110. ACM (2008).
9. Schätzle, A., Przyjaciel-Zablocki, M., Lausen, G.: PigSPARQL: Mapping SPARQL to
Pig Latin. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Web Information
Management (SWIM) , pp. 4:1-4:8 (2011).
10. Schmidt, M., Hornung, T., Lausen, G., Pinkel, C.: SP2Bench: A SPARQL Performance
Benchmark. In: Proc. ICDE , pp. 222-233 (2009).
11. Guo, Y., Pan, Z., Heflin, J.: LUBM: A Benchmark for OWL Knowledge Base Systems.
Web Semantics 3(2), 158-162 (2005).
12. Pérez, J., Arenas, M., Gutierrez, C.: Semantics and Complexity of SPARQL. ACM
Trans. Database Syst. (TODS) 34(3), 16 (2009).
13. Ghemawat, S., Gobioff, H., Leung, S.T.: The Google File System. In: Proc. SOSP ,
pp. 29-43 (2003).
14. Blanas, S., Patel, J.M., Ercegovac, V., Rao, J., Shekita, E.J., Tian, Y.: A Comparison of
Join Algorithms for Log Processing in MapReduce. In: SIGMOD (2010).
15. Lee, K.H., Lee, Y.J., Choi, H., Chung, Y.D., Moon, B.: Parallel Data Processing with
MapReduce: A Survey. SIGMOD Rec. 40(4), 11-20 (2011).
16. Apache: Pig Latin Reference Manual 1 and 2. Available at http://pig.apache.org/docs/
(2010).
17. Hartig, O., Heese, R.: The SPARQL Query Graph Model for Query Optimization. In:
The Semantic Web: Research and Applications , pp. 564-578 (2007).
18. Schmidt, M., Meier, M., Lausen, G.: Foundations of SPARQL Query Optimization. In:
Proc. ICDT , pp. 4-33 (2010).
19. Stocker, M., Seaborne, A., Bernstein, A., Kiefer, C., Reynolds, D.: SPARQL Basic
Graph Pattern Optimization Using Selectivity Estimation. In: Proc. WWW , pp. 595-604
(2008).
20. Abadi, D.J., Marcus, A., Madden, S., Hollenbach, K.J.: Scalable Semantic Web Data
Management Using Vertical Partitioning. In: Proc. VLDB , pp. 411-422 (2007).
21. Ley, M.: DBLP Bibliography. Available at http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/ley/db/
(2010).