Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
real population, which is supposedly composed by a mixture of conformist and
non-conformist people who do not change easily their attitude.
In Sec. 2 we introduce a class of probabilistic cellular automata characterized
by the size 2 r +1 of the neighborhood, a majority threshold q , a coupling constant
J and an external field H .
We are interested in the two extreme cases: people living on a one-dimensional
lattice, interacting only with their nearest neighbors ( r = 1) and people inter-
acting with a mean-field opinion. 2
In Sec. 3 we present the simplest case where each individual interacts with his
two nearest neighbors ( r = 1), the mean field phase diagram and the one found
from numerical experiments. For this simple case, we find a complex behavior
which includes first and second order phase transitions, a chaotic region and
the presence of two universality classes [6]. In Sec. 4 we discuss the mean field
behavior of the model for arbitrary neighborhoods and majority thresholds when
the external field is zero and the coupling constant is negative (non-conformist
society). The phase diagram of the model exhibits a large region of coherent
temporal oscillations of the whole populations, either chaotic or regular. These
oscillations are still present in the lattice version with a su 9 cient large fraction
of long-range connections among individuals, due to the small-world effect [7].
2 The Model
We denote by x i the opinion assumed by individual i at time t . We shall limit
to two opinions, denoted by 1 and 1 as usual in spin models. The system is
composed by L individuals arranged on a one-dimensional lattice. All operations
on spatial indices are assumed to be modulo L (periodic boundary conditions).
The time is considered discontinuous (corresponding, for instance, to election
events). The state of the whole system at time t is given by x t =( x 0 ,...,x t L− 1 )
with x i ∈{− 1 , 1 } ;
The individual opinion is formed according to a local community “pressure”
and a global influence. In order to avoid a tie, we assume that the local commu-
nity is formed by 2 r +1 individuals, counting on equal ground the opinion of the
individual himself at previous time. The average opinion of the local community
around site i at time t is denoted by m i = j = −r x i + j .
The control parameters are the probabilities p s of choosing opinion 1 at time
t +1 if this opinion is shared by s people in the local community, i.e. if the local
“field” is m =2 s − 2 r − 1.
Let J be a parameter controlling the influence of the local field in the opinion
formation process and H be the external social pressure. The probability p s are
given by
p s = p ( m +2 r +1) / 2 exp( H + Jm ) .
2
Related models in one and two dimensions have been studied in Refs [4,5].
Search WWH ::




Custom Search