Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
80
70
60
Dij
Kij
50
40
30
100 mm concrete
(lightweight)
4 x130 mm PUR
Wooden floor on joist
20
180 mm concrete
4x88 mm PUR
10
0
63
125 250 500 1000 2000 4000
Frequency (Hz)
Figure 9.22 Vibration reduction index K ij and velocity level differences D ij with elastic layers on both sides of
joint. Measurement data from a dwelling by Brøsted Pedersen (1993).
Each of these flanking reduction indexes R f may be expressed by Equation (9.33) ,
which combined with the appropriate vibration reduction index K ij using Equation (9.41)
gives
Saa
RR
+
S
ij
i
j
(9.46)
R
=
+
K
+ ⋅
10 lg
.
ij
ij
2
l
SS
ij
i
j
This expression found in EN 12354-1 was derived in a similar way as outlined in section
9.3.1. As mentioned in section 9.3.2.2 a relationship between the vibration reduction
index K ij and the coupling loss factor η ij according to a SEA model may be established.
Indeed, using the framework of SEA, Nightingale and Bosmans (2003) arrive at an
identical expression for , under the condition that the flanking reduction indexes apply
to resonant transmission only. The added advantage, by using SEA, is that this enables
them to formulate criteria to assess the suitability of the expressions in particular
situations.
Besides finding proper estimates for K ij relevant for the actual in situ situation,
there remains the problem of finding corresponding data for the structural damping given
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search