Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
j
kd
j
kd
ˆ
ˆ
p
ρ
c pe
+
pe
00
i
r
Z
=
=
.
(5.20)
a
j
kd
j
kd
vS
S
ˆ
ˆ
pe
p e
xd
=
i
r
As we assume that the closed end is totally reflecting, the sound pressure amplitudes in
the two partial waves must be equal. This gives us
2
2
ρ
c
ρ
ω
c
ρ
c
kd
<<
1
00
00
00
Z
=−
j
cotg(
kd
)
⎯⎯⎯ →−
j
=−
j
.
(5.21)
a
S
S
d
ω
V
Making the approximation kd << 1 we see that the result is the same as derived above.
The equivalent acoustical stiffness is again ρ 0 c 0 2 / V .
d
v =0
p i
S
p r
Figure 5.9 Plane waves in a tube. The tube is terminated by a totally reflecting surface.
5.4.1.2 The acoustic mass in a tube
Using a similar procedure, as when deducing the stiffness, we shall find an expression
for the equivalent mass by calculating the acoustical impedance at a distance d from a
pressure release surface , i.e. the pressure at the surface is zero as opposed to the above
setting the particle velocity equal to zero. The same procedure that gave us Equation
(5.21) will now give
ρ
c
ωρ
d
00
kd
<<
1
0
Z
=
j
tg(
kd
)
j
.
(5.22)
a
S
S
The equivalent acoustical mass is therefore ρ 0 d/S . We are now in a position to calculate
the resonance frequency of a resonator having a volume V and a “neck” of length d with
a cross sectional area of S . We get:
2
ω
1
k
1
ρ
c S
c
S
0
a
0
0
0
f
==
=
=
.
(5.23)
0
22
ππ
m
2
πρ π
V
d
2
Vd
a
0
For a more accurate calculation we must take into account that the effective oscillating
mass is larger than the one contained in the neck. We have to add the so-called end
correction . Furthermore, making use of the resonator requires information on the energy
losses of the system. We shall treat the latter item first.
 
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search