Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
virtual embeddedness is a good complementary vehicle to modularity in the man-
agement of product development among CoPS firms. The chapter concludes with a
discussion of the important implications for future research in this area.
In the concluding chapter, Chapter 10, Satish Nambisan draws on the issues dis-
cussed in the different chapters and outlines an agenda for future research on IT
and product/service development. It is evident that much of the focus is needed
on understanding how IT can be intertwined with the structure and the processes
that underlie the dominant innovation model of the future, namely, collaborative
or network-centric innovation. This will require bringing together concepts and
insights from different theoretical areas and perspectives to explain how varied
IT capabilities may enhance the nature and process of collaborative innovation.
A second emphasis of future research should be on the role of IT in increasing
the rigor and discipline of product and service innovation. The different issues
that fall within these two themes present a challenging but rewarding agenda for
future research - one that could help redefine the role of IT in product and service
innovation.
References
Ali, Y., Ki-Chan, K., Thomas, R., &Matthias, H. (2004). Investigating the role of IT in customized
product design. Production Planning & Control, 15 (4), 422-435.
Allen, T. J. (1970). Communication networks in R&D laboratories. R&D Management, 1 , 14-21.
Ancona, D. J, & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: external activity and performance
in organizational teams. Administration Science Quarterly, 37 , 634-665.
Banker, R. D., Bardhan, I., & Asdemir, O. (2006). Understanding the impact of collaboration
software on product design and development. Information Systems Research, 17 (4), 352-374.
Bardhan, I. (2007). Toward a theory to study the use of collaborative product commerce for product
development. Information Technology and Management, 8 (2), 167-180.
Boutellier, R. Gassman, O., Macho, H., & Roux, M. (1998). Management of dispersed product
development teams: The role of information technologies. R&D Management, 28 (1), 13-25.
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K.M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings,
and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20 , 343-378.
Chesbrough, H., & Spohrer, J. (2006). A research manifesto for services science. Communications
of the ACM, 49 (7), 35-40.
Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto. T. (1991). Product development performance . Boston: Harvard Business
School Press.
Clarke, S. (2007). Information systems strategic management: An integrated approach .NewYork:
Routledge.
Cooper, R. G. ( 2001 ) . Winning at new products. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publications.
Cooper R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2001). Portfolio management for new product development:
Results of an industry practices study. R&D Management, 31 (4).
Cooper, R. G., Edgett, S. J., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1999). New product portfolio management:
Practices and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16 (4), 333-351.
Cramton, D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collabo-
ration. Organization Science, 12 (3), 346-371.
Cusumano, M., & Nobeoka, K. (1992). Strategy, structure, and performance in product develop-
ment: Observations from the auto industry. Research Policy, 21 , 265-293.
Dahan, E., & Hauser, J. R. (2001). Managing a dispersed product development process. In B. Weitz
& R. Wensley (Eds.), Handbook of marketing . New York: Sage Publications.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search