Novel Approaches to Immersive Media: From Enlarged Field-of-View to Multi-sensorial Experiences - Novel 3D Media Technologies - page 22

52. De Kort YAW, Ijsselsteijn WA, Kooijman J, Schuurmans Y (2003) Virtual laboratories:
comparability of real and virtual environments for environmental psychology. Presence-
Teleop Virtual Environ 12:360-373
53. Bowman DA, McMahan RP (2007) Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough? Com-
puter (Long Beach Calif) 40:36-43. doi: 10.1109/MC.2007.257
54. Slater M (2009) Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive
virtual environments. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364:3549-3557. doi: 10.1098/rstb.
2009.0138
55. Slater M (2003) A note on presence terminology. Presence-Connect, pp 1-5
56. Steuer J (1992) Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J Commun
42:73-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x
57. Ijsselsteijn W, de Ridder H, Freeman J et al (2001) Effects of stereoscopic presentation, image
motion, and screen size on subjective and objective corroborative measures of presence.
Presence-Teleop Virtual Environ 10:298-311
58. Hands DS (2004) A basic multimedia quality model. IEEE Trans Multimedia 6:806-816.
doi: 10.1109/TMM.2004.837233
59. Hwang J, Kim GJ (2010) Provision and maintenance of presence and immersion in hand-held
virtual reality through motion based interaction. Comput Animat Virtual Worlds 21:547-559
60. Hendrix C, Barfield W (1995) Presence in virtual environments as a function of visual and
auditory cues. In: Proceedings of Virtual Real Annu Int Symp. pp 74-82. doi: 10.1109/VRAIS.
1995.512482
61. Lin JJ-W, Duh HBL, Parker DE et al (2002) Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment,
memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. In: Proc. IEEE Virtual Real. IEEE
Comput. Soc., pp 164-171
62. Freeman J, Avons SE, Pearson DE, IJsselsteijn WA (1999) Effects of sensory information and
prior experience on direct subjective ratings of presence. Presence-Teleop Virtual Environ
8:1-13. doi: 10.1162/105474699566017
63. Bleumers L, Lievens B, Pierson J (2011) From sensory dream to television format: gathering
user feedback on the use and experience of omnidirectional video-based solutions. In: ISPR
2011 Int. Soc. PRESENCE Res. Annu. Conf.
64. Slater M, Khanna P, Mortensen J, Yu I (2009) Visual realism enhances realistic response in an
immersive virtual environment. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 29:76-84
65. Welch RB, Blackmon TT, Liu A et al (1996) The effects of pictorial realism, delay of visual
feedback, and observer interactivity an the subjective sense of presence. Presence-Teleop
Virtual Environ 5:263-273
66. Barfield W, Hendrix C (1995) The effect of update rate on the sense of presence within virtual
environments. Virtual Real 1:3-15. doi: 10.1007/BF02009709
67. Meehan M (2001) Physiological reaction as an objective measure of presence in virtual
environments. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
68. Luque FP, Galloso I, Feijoo C, Mart ´ n CA, Cisneros G (2014) Integration of multisensorial
stimuli and multimodal interaction in a hybrid 3DTV system. ACM Trans Multimedia Comput
Commun Appl 11(1s):16:1-16:22. doi: 10.1145/2617992
69. Beerends JG, De Caluwe FE (1999) The influence of video quality on perceived audio quality
and vice versa. J Audio Eng Soc 47:355-362
70. Slater M, Usoh M, Steed A (1995) Taking steps: the influence of a walking technique on
presence in virtual reality. ACM Trans Comput Interact 2:201-219. doi: 10.1145/210079.
210084
71. De Ruyter B, Aarts E (2004) Ambient intelligence: visualizing the future. In: Proc. Work.
Conf. Adv. Vis. interfaces - AVI 04. ACM Press, New York, p 203

72. Waltl M, Timmerer C, Hellwagner H (2010) Increasing the user experience of multimedia
presentations with sensory effects. In: 11th Int. Work Image Anal. Multimed. Interact. Serv.
(WIAMIS). IEEE, Desenzano del Garda, pp 1-4

'