Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
D.
The Spin-Echo Calculation
The most significant difference between the spin-echo and simple bipolar pulse
sequences is the timing gap between the first and second rectangular gradients. We
follow the Stejskal and Tanner method [36] once again and employ
γ 2 D F ( t ) θ ( t )
τ ) F ( τ ) 2 S
dS
dt
=−
2 θ ( t
(156)
= t
0 G ( t ) dt
and θ ( t ) is the unit step function. The 180
where F ( t )
refocusing
pulse is placed midway between the two gradient pulses, at t
=
τ . Each of the
gradient functions has duration τ and the second pulse begins at t
=
. The solution
of Eq.(156) is
t
S (0) exp
g ( t ) dt
S ( t )
=
(157)
0
where
τ
γ 2 D τ
0
4 F ( τ ) τ
0
τ ) F 2 ( τ )
g ( t ) dt =−
F 2 ( t ) dt
F ( t ) dt +
4( τ
0
(158)
The fractional evaluation becomes more complicated, as we must integrate over
two arbitrary time intervals t 1 and t 2 , and therefore must define the two gradient
integrals, F ( t 1 ) and F ( t 2 ).
F ( t 1 )
F ( t 1 ) θ ( t 1 )
2 θ ( t 1
τ ) F ( τ )
F ( t 2 )
F ( t 2 ) θ ( t 2 )
2 θ ( t 2
τ ) F ( τ )
(159)
Recalling Eq.(146), we have
t
dt 2 t 1
0
kT
α
1
1
2 ( t )
2 γ 2
=
t 2 ) 2 α F ( t 1 ) F ( t 2 ) dt 1
(160)
( α
1)
( t 1
0
Here the product of F ( t 1 ) and F ( t 2 ) can be presented as:
= F ( t 1 ) θ ( t 1 )
τ ) F ( τ ) F ( t 2 ) θ ( t 2 )
τ ) F ( τ )
F ( t 1 ) F ( t 2 )
2 θ ( t 1
2 θ ( t 2
=
F ( t 1 ) F ( t 2 ) θ ( t 1 ) θ ( t 2 )
2 F ( τ ) F ( t 2 ) θ ( t 2 ) θ ( t 1
τ )
4 F 2 ( τ ) θ ( t 1
2 F ( t 1 ) F ( τ ) θ ( t 1 ) θ ( t 2
τ )
+
τ ) θ ( t 2
τ )
(161)
The evaluation of integrals in Eq.(160) can then be performed in piecewise fashion
provided we can write F ( t ) explicitly in four intervals of integration, namely,
(0 ) , ( δ, ) , ( ,
+
δ ) , (
+
δ, 2 τ )
Search WWH ::




Custom Search