Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
because we may take (0)
=
0, we have Eqs. (94) and (95), in the noninertial case
for a step field gradient
γ
ζ
G ( t ) dt dt 2 γλ ( t 1 )
ζ
G ( t ) dt dt 1
2 t
0
t 1
λ ( t 2 ) t 2
0
t 1
2 ( t )
=
(98)
0
0
t
t 1
λ ( t 2 ) t 2
0
G ( t ) dt dt 2 λ ( t 1 ) t 1
0
2 γ 2
ζ 2
G ( t ) dt dt 1
=
0
0
t
t 1
t 1
G ( t ) dt t 2
0
2 γ 2
ζ 2
G ( t ) dt λ ( t 1 ) λ ( t 2 ) dt 1 dt 2
=
(99)
0
0
0
Recalling the definition of λ ( t ) and the fact that G ( t ) is not stochastic,
t
t 1
t 1
G ( t ) dt t 2
0
2
2 γ 2
ζ 2
G ( t ) dt λ ( t 1 ) λ ( t 2 ) dt 1 dt 2
=
(100)
0
0
0
2 kTζ t
0
t 1
t 1
G ( t ) dt t 2
0
2 γ 2
ζ 2
G ( t ) dt δ ( t 2
=
t 1 ) dt 1 dt 2
0
0
Now the one-sided delta function has a sifting property such that,
t 2
f ( t 2 )
2
f ( t 1 ) δ ( t 2
t 1 ) dt 1 =
0
Thus, for a rectangular field gradient pulse of strength G ,
ζ 2 kTζ t
dt 2 t 1
0
G ( t ) dt t 2
0
4 γ 2
2
G ( t ) dt
=
0
t
t 2
dt 2
2 γ 2 G 2 kT
ζ
=
dt 2
0
0
Hence,
2
2
1
3 γ 2 G 2 Dt 3
=
(101)
Thus we have the Carr-Purcell-Torrey Eq. (60) result for the dephasing [29]
following the application of a single-step gradient,
exp
3 2 G 2 t 3
e i =
1
e 2
/ 2
=
(102)
The gradient-echo result, Eq.(64), may be obtained in a similar manner. For
the spin-echo case, Eq.(69) may be obtained by writing the right-hand side of
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search