Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
References
1. Bloehdorn S, Haase P, Sure Y, Voelker J, Bevk M, Bontcheva K, Roberts I
(2005) Report on the integration of ML, HLT and OM. SEKT Deliverable
D.6.6.1, July 2005.
2. Brewster C, Alani H, Dasmahapatra S, Wilks Y (2004) Data driven ontology
evaluation. In: Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Eval-
uation, Lisbon, Portugal, 26-28 May 2004.
3. Burton-Jones A, Storey V C, Sugumaran V, Ahluwalia P (2004) A semiotic
metrics suite for assessing the quality of ontologies. Data and Knowledge En-
gineering 55(1):84-102.
4. Chawathe S S, Rajaraman A, Garcia-Molina H, Widom J (1996). Change Detec-
tion in Hierarchically Structured Information. In: Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD
Conference, pp. 493-504, 1996.
5. Ding L, Finin T, Joshi A, Pan R, Cost R S, Peng Y, Reddivari P, Doshi V,
Sachs J (2004). Swoogle: A search and metadata engine for the semantic web.
In: Proc. ACM Conf. on Information and Knowledge Mgmt, pp. 652-659, 2004.
6. Ehrig M, Haase P, Hefke M, Stojanovic N (2005). Similarity for ontologies —
a comprehensive framework. In: Proc. 13th Eur. Conf. Information Sys., 2005.
7. Fox M S, Barbuceanu M, Gruninger M, Lin J (1998). An organization ontol-
ogy for enterprise modelling. In: Prietula M et al. (eds.) Simulating organi-
zations: Computational models of institutions and groups, AAAI/MIT Press,
1998, pp. 131-152.
8. Gomez-Perez A (1994) Some ideas and examples to evaluate ontologies. Knowl-
edge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, 1994.
9. Gomez-Perez A (1996) Towards a framework to verify knowledge sharing tech-
nology. Expert Systems with Applications, 11(11.4):519-529.
10. Grobelnik M, Mladenic D (2005) Automated Knowledge Discovery in Advanced
Knowledge Management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(5):132-149.
11. Guarino N, Welty C (2002) Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean.
Communications of the ACM, 45(2):61-65, February 2002.
12. Hartmann J, Spyns P, Giboin A, Maynard D, Cuel R, Suarez-Figueroa M C,
Sure Y (2005) Methods for ontology evaluation. KnowledgeWeb Deliverable
D1.2.3, January 2005.
13. Haussler, D (1999) Convolution kernels on discrete structures. Technical report,
Department of Computer Science, University of California at Santa Cruz, 1999.
14. Levenshtein VI (1966) Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions,
and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady 10(8):707-710.
15. Lozano-Tello A, Gomez-Perez A (2004) Ontometric: A method to choose the
appropriate ontology. Journal of Database Management, 15(2):1-18.
16. Maedche A, Staab S (2002) Measuring similarity between ontologies. In: Proc.
13th Conf. on Information and Knowledge Mgmt. (2002). LNAI vol. 2473.
17. Meila M (2003) Comparing clusterings by the variation of information. In: Proc.
of the 16th Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, 2003.
18. Meila M (2005) Comparing clusterings — an axiomatic view. In: Proc. of the
Int. Conference on Machine Learning, 2005.
19. Mladenic D (1998) Machine Learning on non-homogeneous, distributed text
data. Ph. D. thesis, University of Ljubljana, 1998.
20. Mladenic D, Grobelnik M (2003) Feature selection on hierarchy of web docu-
ments. Journal of Decision support systems, 35:45-87.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search