Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
8. Charniak, E. (2000) A Maximum-Entropy-Inspired Parser. Proceedings of the
North-American Chapter of Association for Computational Linguistics, Seattle,
WA
9. Charniak, E. & Johnson, M. (2005) Coarse-to-fine n-best parsing and Max-
Ent discriminative reranking. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the
Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 173-180). Ann Arbor, MI
10. Collins, M. (1996) A New Statistical Parser Based on Bigram Lexical Depen-
dencies. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the ACL, Santa Cruz, CA
11. Collins, M. (1997) Three Generative, Lexicalised Models for Statistical Parsing
Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational
Linguistics, Madrid, Spain.
12. Crossley, S., Louwerse, M.M., McCarthy, P.M., & McNamara, D.S. (forthcom-
ing 2007). A linguistic analysis of simplified and authentic texts. Modern Lan-
guage Journal, 91, (2).
13. Dennis, S., Landauer, T., Kintsch, W. & Quesada, J. (2003). Introduction to
Latent Semantic Analysis. Slides from the tutorial given at the 25th Annual
Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston.
14. Duran, N., McCarthy, P.M., Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., (2006). An em-
pirical study of temporal indices. Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of
the Cognitive Science Society, 2006.
15. Foltz, P. W., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1996). Reasoning from multiple
texts: An automatic analysis of readers' situation models. In G. W. Cottrell
(Ed.) Proceedings of the 18th Annual Cognitive Science Conference (pp. 110-
115). Lawrence Erlbaum, NJ.
16. Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of
textual Coherence with Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285-
307.
17. Foltz, P. W., Gilliam, S., & Kendall, S. (2000). Supporting content-based feed-
back in on-line writing evaluation with LSA. Interactive Learning Environ-
ments, 8, 111-127.
18. Gernsbacher, M.A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Givn, T. (1995). Coherence in the text and coherence in the mind. In Gerns-
bacher, M.A. & Givn, T., Coherence in spontaneous text. (pp. 59-115). Ams-
terdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
20. Graesser, A.C. (1993). Inference generation during text comprehension. Dis-
course Processes, 16, 1-2.
21. Graesser, A.C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences dur-
ing narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-95.
22. Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D., Louwerse, M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix:
CohMetrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavioral Research
Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 193-202.
23. Hearst, M.A. (1994) Multi-paragraph Segmentation of Expository Text. Pro-
ceedings of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Las Cruces, NM.
24. Hobbs, J.R. (1985). On the coherence and structure of discourse. CSLI Tech-
nical Report, 85-37. Stanford, CA.
25. Hovy, E. (1990). Parsimonious and profligate approaches to the question of dis-
course structure relations. Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on
Natural Language generation, East Stroudsburg, PA, Association for Compu-
tational Linguistics.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search