Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
TABLE 13.3
Summary of Treatability Study Results for Soil Core Samples in
Case Study #2
Performance Evaluation
Preliminary
Stabilized and
Unstabilized
Unstabilized
Stabilized
Volatile
Organic Compound
TCLP
(mg/L)
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
(mg/L)
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
(mg/L)
Vinyl chloride
< 0.009
< 0.009
< 0.009
< 0.15
< 0.002
1,1 - Dichloroethylene
< 0.007
< 0.007
< 0.007
< 0.12
< 0.002
Methylene chloride
< 0.006
< 0.006-0.012
< 0.006
< 0.10
< 0.004
Trans - 1,2 - Dichoroethylene
< 0.007
< 0.007
< 0.007
< 0.12
< 0.002
1,1 - Dichloroethane
< 0.006
< 0.006
< 0.006
< 0.10
< 0.001
Chloroform
< 0.007
< 0.007
< 0.007
< 0.12
< 0.002
1,1,1 - Trichloroethane
< 0.012
< 0.012-0.054
< 0.012
< 0.20-0.44
< 0.003
Carbon tetrachloride
< 0.009
< 0.009
< 0.009
< 0.15
< 0.003
1,2 - Dichloroethane
< 0.006
< 0.006
< 0.006
< 0.10
< 0.002
Trichloroethylene
< 0.013
< 0.013-0.059
< 0.013
< 0.22
< 0.003
were performed according to EPA SW-846 Method 8260. Total uranium was analyzed
according to CNES Science and Technology Division Method 90284 using a laser
kinetic phosphorimeter. Total technetium was analyzed according to method EC 206
for soils, and EC 038 for waters, both MMES methods.
A summary of results is shown in Table 13.3. Only three of the ten target
compounds were detected in samples. Methylene chloride and TCE were detected
at levels just above the analytical detection limit in two untreated core samples.
Neither was detected in the treated samples. Also, 1,1,1-trichloroethane was detected
at levels just above the analytical detection limit in one untreated core sample, but
was detected at elevated levels in the total volatiles analysis of two of the treated
core samples. This appears to be an anomaly, since these results are 5 to 10 times
higher than the total VOC results of the untreated samples. Previous experience
suggests that “hot spots” (small localized areas in the soil that contain elevated levels
of volatile organics) could be present in the soil and cause this type of response.
The TCLP results suggest that the admixture handled these elevated levels. However,
proof of reagent effectiveness is uncertain from these treatability study results,
because total analysis results indicate significant losses during mixing of the small
core samples, an inherent problem when working with VOCs. The in situ system
for the field demonstration likely resulted in less loss from mixing, although verifi-
cation proved difficult, as attested to in Section 13.4.2.5. No uranium was detected
in the untreated and treated samples (detection limit of 20 ppm). Small amounts of
technetium (up to 1.7 pCi/g) were present in the untreated samples. No technetium
was detected in the TCLP extract of the treated samples, but this could be from
dilution.
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search