Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 7. Trial of various harmony search algorithm parameters
Cases
Hms
hmcr
par
Weight (kg)
1
10
0.70
0.25
1,028.79
2
30
0.85
0.35
1,017.11
3
10
0.75
0.50
1,014.40
4
20
0.90
0.20
971.86
5
20
0.80
0.45
968.16
6
30
0.90
0.30
937.32
7
10
0.75
0.45
933.41
8
20
0.85
0.40
931.87
9
30
0.80
0.25
929.59
10
30
0.70
0.30
925.24
Table 8. Optimum design of cellular beam with 9m span
Optimum
UB-Section
Designations
Maximum
Strength
Ratio
Hole
Diameter
(mm)
Minimum
Weight
(kg)
Total
Number
of Holes
533 ä 210 ä 109 UB
586
11
0.98
925.24
50 kN
50 kN
40 kN/m
3.0 m
3.0 m
3.0 m
9.0 m
Fig. 12. Optimum profile of the cellular beam
prior to its use. For this reason a parametric study is carried out with different values
of these parameters and the results obtained is shown in Table 7.
The table covers 10 different cases and for each case the total number of iterations
is taken as 10,000. It is apparent from the table that the minimum weight for the cellu-
lar beam is obtained with hms =30, hmcr =0.70 and par =0.30. In the optimum design
harmony search algorithm selects 533×210×109 UB profile, 11 circular holes and 586
mm for the hole diameter. This design has the minimum weight of 925.24 kg. The op-
timum result is given in Table 8. The maximum strength ratio is equal to 0.98 while
Search WWH ::




Custom Search