Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
More
Strict
Trustworthiness
Less
Strict
Trustworthiness
More carefulness,
concentration, attention,
willingness, reliability by Y.
AND More possibility of
successfull recover by X
More anxiety, less
concentration and
willingness by Y. AND
More possibility of
successfull recover by X
More
Broad/Global
Trust
More carefulness,
concentration, attention,
willingness, reliability by Y.
AND Possibility of wrong
intervention, mistakes by X
More anxiety, less
concentration and
willingness by Y. AND
Possibility of wrong
intervention, mistakes by X
Less
Broad/Global
Trust
+
Increasing
CONTROL
Decreasing
-
More
Strict
Trustworthiness
Less
Strict
Trustworthiness
More responsibility, self-
confidence, commitments
by Y. AND
Less possibility of wrong
intervention, mistakes by X
More possibility of
deception by Y. AND
Less possibility of wrong
intervention, mistakes by
X
More
Broad/Global
Trust
More responsibility, self-
confidence, commitments
by Y. AND
Less possibility of
successfull recover by X
More possibility of
deception by Y. AND
Less possibility of
successfull recover by X
Less
Broad/Global
Trust
Figure 7.9
How Strict and Broad Trust change in relation with the Control's change
just-in-time reactivity, or some physical skill that requires some local control-loop. Thus
autonomy and initiative are not simply optional features for
agents
, they are necessary
requirements, and obligatory directions of study.
However,
control cannot be completely lost and delegation cannot be complete
, not only
for reasons of confidence and trust, but for reasons of distribution of goals, of knowledge, of
competence, and for an effective coordination. In this sense the possibility of controlling and
adjusting the autonomy of the agents is becoming a growing and interesting field of research.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search