Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
42. Soul´ ME, Estes AJ, Miller B, Honnold DL (2005) Strongly interacting species: conservation
policy, management and ethics. BioScience 55:168-176
43. Rooney N, McCann K, Gellner G, Moore JC (2006) Structural asymmetry and the stability of
diverse food webs. Nature 442:265-269
44. Boyd I, Wanless S, Camphuysen CJ (eds) (2006) Top predators in marine ecosystems.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
45. Johnson CN (2010) Red in tooth and claw: how top predators shape terrestrial ecosystems.
J Anim Ecol 79:723-725
46. Borrvall C, Ebenman B (2006) Early onset of secondary extinction in ecological communities
following the loss of top predators. Ecol Lett 9:435-442
47. Henke SE, Bryant FC (1999) Effects of coyote removal on the faunal community in western
Texas. J Wildlife Manage 63:1066-1081
48. Crooks JA, Soul ´ ME (1999) Lag times in population explosions of invasive species: causes
and implications. In: Viken A (ed) Invasive species and biodiversity management. Kluwer,
Dordrecht, pp 103-126
49. Letnic M, Koch F, Gordon C, Crowther MS, Dickman CR (2009) Keystone effects of an alien
top-predator stem extinctions of native mammals. Proc Roy Soc Biol Sci 276:3249-3256
50. McLaren BE, Peterson RO (1994) Wolves, moose, and tree rings on isle royale. Science
266:1555-1558
51. Ripple WJ, Beschta RL (2003) Wolf reintroduction, predation risk, and cottonwood recovery
in Yellowstone National Park. Forest Ecol Manag 184:299-313
52. Owen-Smith RN (1988) Megaherbivores: the influence of very large body size on ecology.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
53. Bush GL (1993) A reaffirmation of Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many kinds of small
animals? In: Lees DR, Edwards D (eds) Evolutionary patterns and processes. Academic,
London, pp 229-249
54. Olff H, Ritchie ME, Prins HHT (2002) Global environmental controls of diversity in large
herbivores. Nature 415:901-904
55. Haskell JP, Ritchie ME, Olff H (2002) Fractal geometry predicts varying body size scaling
relationships for mammal and bird home ranges. Nature 418:527-530
56. Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, UK
57. Ritchie ME, Olff H (1999) Spatial scaling laws yield a synthetic theory of biodiversity. Nature
400:557-560
58. Allesina S, Bodini A, Bondavalli C (2006) Secondary extinctions in ecological networks:
bottlenecks unveiled. Ecol Model 194:150-161
59. Dunne JA, Williams RJ, Martinez ND (2004) Network structure and robustness of marine food
webs. Marine Ecol Prog Ser 273:291-302
60. Estrada E (2007) Characterisation of topological keystone species: local, global and “meso-
scale” centralities in food webs. Ecol Complex 4:48-57
61. Jord ´ n F, Benedek Z, Podani J (2007) Quantifying positional importance in food webs:
a comparison of centrality indices. Ecol Model 205:270-275
62. Jord ´ n F, Liu W-C, Mike A (2009) Trophic field overlap: a new approach to quantify keystone
species. Ecol Model 220:2899-2907
63. De Ruiter PC, Neutel A, Moore JC (1995) Energetics, patterns of interaction strengths, and
stability in real ecosystems. Science 269:1257-1260
64. Batcheler CL (1983) The possum and rata-kamahi dieback in New Zealand: a review. Pac Sci
37:415-426
65. Rose AB, Pekelharing CJ, Platt KH (1992) Magnitude of canopy dieback and implications for
conservation of southern rata-kamahi (Metrosideros umbellate-Weinmannia racemosa)
forests, central Westland, New Zealand. New Zeal J Ecol 16:23-32
66. Wardle JA (1984) The New Zealand beeches: ecology, utilization and management. New
Zealand Forest Service, Christchurch, p 447
Search WWH ::




Custom Search