Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
83. Dushoff J, Worden L, Keymer J, Levin S (2002) Metapopulations, community assenbly, and
scale invariance in aspect space. Theor Popul Biol 62:329-338
84. Kohyama T (1993) Size-structured tree populations in gap-dynamic forest-the forest archi-
tecture hypothesis for the stable coexistence of species. J Ecol 81:131-143
85. Vance RR, Nevai AL (2007) Plant population growth and competition in a light gradient:
a mathematical model of canopy partitioning. J Theor Biol 245:210-219
86. Connell JH (1970) On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some
marine animals and rainforest trees. In: den Boer PJ, Gradwell G (eds) Dynamics of
populations. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, pp 298-312
87. Janzen DH (1970) Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. Am Nat
104:501-528
88. Adler FR, Muller-Landau HC (2005) When do localized natural enemies increase species
richness? Ecol Lett 8:438-447
89. Bever JD, Dickie IA, Facelli E, Facelli JM, Klironomos J, Moora M, Rillig MC, Stock WD,
Tibbett M, Zobel M (2010) Rooting theories of plant community ecology in microbial
interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 25:468-478
90. Klironomos JN (2002) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in
communities. Nature 417:67-70
91. Shea K, Chesson P (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological
invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:170-176
92. Melbourne BA, Cornell HV, Davies KF, Dugaw CJ, Elmendorf S, Freestone AL, Hall RJ,
Harrison S, Hastings A, Holland M, Holyoak M, Lambrinos J, Moore K, Yokomizo H (2007)
Invasion in a heterogeneous world: resistance, coexistence or hostile takeover? Ecol Lett
10:77-94
93. Drury WH (1998) Chance and change: ecology for conservationists. University of California
Press, Berkeley, Calif
94. Sergio F, Caro T, Brown D, Clucas B, Hunter J, Ketchum J, McHugh K, Hiraldo F (2008) Top
predators as conservation tools: ecological rationale, assumptions, and efficacy. Annu Rev
Ecol Evol Syst 39:1-19
95. Kinzig A, Pacala S, Tilman D (eds) (2001) The functional consequences of biodiversity.
Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
96. Sax DF, Gaines SD (2008) Species invasions and extinction: the future of native biodiversity
on islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11490-11497
97. Reinhart KO, Callaway RM (2006) Soil biota and invasive plants. New Phytol 170:445-457
98. Sher AA, Hyatt LA (1999) The disturbed resource-flux invasion matrix: a new framework for
patterns of plant invasion. Biological Invasions 1:107-114
99. Brooks ML (2003) Effects of increased soil nitrogen on the dominance of alien annual plants
in the Mojave Desert. J Appl Ecol 40:344-353
100. Simberloff D (1995) Why do introduced species appear to devastate islands more than
mainland areas? Pac Sci 49:87-97
101. Huston MA (1994) Biological diversity, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
102. Callaway RM, Ridenour WM (2004) Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of
increased competitive ability. Front Ecol Environ 2:436-443
103. Elton C (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen and Co, London
104. Levine JM (2000) Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to
community pattern. Science 288:852-854
105. Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis.
Trends Ecol Evol 17:164-169
106. MacDougall AS, Gilbert B, Levine JM (2009) Plant invasions and the niche. J Ecol
97:609-615
107. Davies KF, Chesson P, Harrison S, Inouye B, Melbourne BA, Rice KJ (2005) Spatial
heterogeneity explains the scale dependence of the native-exotic diversity relationship.
Ecology 86:1602-1610
Search WWH ::




Custom Search