Effect of soil–structure interaction and spatial variability of ground motion on seismic risk assessment of bridges - Seismic Risk Analysis and Management of Civil Infrastructure Systems - page 616

Mylonakis G, Syngros C, Gazetas G and Tazoh T (2006b) The role of soil in the
collapse of 18 piers of hanshin expressway in the kobe earthquake. Earthquake
Engineering and Structural Dynamics 35 (5): 547-575.
Naeim F, Alimoradi A and Pezeshk S (2004) Selection and scaling of ground motion
time histories for structural design using genetic algorithms. Earthquake Spectra
20 (2): 413.
Nikolaou S, Mylonakis G, Gazetas G and Tazoh T (2001) Kinematic pile bending
during earthquakes: analysis and fi eld measurements. Geotechnique 51 (5): 425-
440. Available at: http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=affi cheN&cpsidt=1088812.
Nogami T, Otani J, Konagai K and Chen H-L (1992) Nonlinear soil-pile interaction
model for dynamic lateral motion. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 118 (1):
89.
Novak M and Mitwally H (1988) Transmitting boundary for axisymmetrical dilation
problems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 114 (1): 181. Available at: http://link.
aip.org/link/?JENMDT/114/181/1.
Pecker A (2007) Advanced Earthquake Engineering Analysis . New York: Springer,
218.
Pender MJ (1993) Aseismic pile foundation design analysis. Bulletin of the New
Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering , 26 (1): 49-161.
Penzien J and Watabe M (1975) Characteristics of 3-dimensional earthquake ground
motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 3 : 365-373.
Renault P and Meskouris K (2005) A coupled BEM/FEM approach for the numeri-
cal simulation of bridge structures. 6th International Conference on Structural
Dynamics , Paris, France, 1267-1272.
Sextos AG (2009) Few thoughts on the numerical simulation of soil, structure and
earthquake input. Earthquake Engineering Workshop , 2-4 June, Capri, Italy.
Sextos AG (2011) Information and communication technologies in earthquake engi-
neering. In: Tsompanakis, Y and Topping BHV (ed) Computational Technology
Reviews, Vol. 4 , Stirling, UK, Saxe-Coburg, 193-224.
Sextos AG and Kappos AJ (2009) Evaluation of seismic response of bridges under
asynchronous excitation and comparisons with Eurocode 8-2 provisions. Bulletin
of Earthquake Engineering 7 (2): 519-545.
Sextos AG, Pitilakis KD and Kappos AJ (2003a) Inelastic dynamic analysis of RC
bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion, site effects and soil-
structure interaction phenomena. Part 1: Methodology and analytical tools. Earth-
quake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 32 (4): 607-627. Available at: http://doi.
wiley.com/10.1002/eqe.241.
Sextos AG, Kappos AJ and Pitilakis KD (2003b) Inelastic dynamic analysis of RC
bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion, site effects and soil-
structure interaction phenomena. Part 2: Parametric study. Earthquake Engineer-
ing & Structural Dynamics 32 (4): 629-652. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com
/10.1002/eqe.242.
Sextos AG, Mackie KR, Stojadinović B and Taskari ON (2008) Simplifi ed P - y rela-
tionships fro modeling embankment-abutment systems of typical California
bridges. 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering , Beijing, China.
Shamsabadi A, Rollins K and Kapuskar M (2007) Nonlinear soil-abutment-bridge
structure interaction for seismic performance-based design. Journal of Geotechni-
cal and Geoenvironmental Engineering June : 707-720.