Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New
York at Bu!alo, Bu!alo, NY, pp. 89-128.
ATC 1985. Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California. Applied Technol-
ogy Council, ATC-13 Report, Redwood City, California.
ATC 2001. Database on the Performance of Structures Near Strong-Motion Record-
ings: 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake. Applied Technology Council,
ATC-38 Report, Redwood City, California.
Balassanian, S.Y., Melkoumian, M.G., Arakelyan, A.R. and Azarian, A.R. 1999.
Seismic risk assessment for the territory of Armenia and strategy of its mitigation.
Natural Hazards
,
20
(1), 43-55.
Barbat, A.H., Carren˜o, M.L., Pujades, L.G., Lantada, N., Cardona, O.D. and Maru-
landa, M.C. 2009. Seismic vulnerability and risk evaluation methods for urban
areas. A review with application to a pilot area.
Structure and Infrastructure Engi-
neering
,
6
(1), 17-38.
Bartlett, S.F. and Youd, T.L. 1992.
Empirical Analysis of Horizontal Ground Dis-
placement Generated by Liquefaction-induced Lateral Spreads
. Brigham Young
University, Provo, Utah, Technical Report NCEER-92-0021, August 1992.
Bartlett, S.F. and Youd, T.L. 1995. Empirical prediction of liquefaction-induced
lateral spread.
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
,
121
(4), 316-329.
Bayraktarli, Y.Y. and Faber, M.H. 2011. Bayesian probabilistic network approach
for managing earthquake risks of cities.
Georisk: Assessment and Management of
Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards
,
5
(1), 2-24.
Bayraktarli, Y.Y., Baker, J.W. and Faber, M.H. 2011. Uncertainty treatment in earth-
quake modelling using Bayesian probabilistic networks.
Georisk: Assessment and
Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards
,
5
(1), 44-58.
Baziar, M.H. and Ghorbani, A. 2005. Evaluation of lateral spreading using artifi cial
neural networks.
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
,
25
(1), 1-9.
Baziar, M.H. and Nilipour, N. 2003. Evaluation of liquefaction potential using neu-
ral-networks and CPT results.
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
,
23
,
631-636.
Bensi, M.T., Der Kiureghian, A. and Straub, D. 2009. A Bayesian Network frame-
work for post-earthquake infrastructure system performance assessment. TCLEE
2009: Lifeline Earthquake Engineering in a Multihazard Environment, Oakland,
CA, June 28-July 1, 2009.
Bird, J.F. and Bommer, J.J. 2004. Earthquake losses due to ground failure.
Engineer-
ing Geology
,
75
, 147-179.
Bird, J.F., Bommer, J.J., Crowley, H. and Pinho, R. 2006. Modelling liquefaction-
induced building damage in earthquake loss estimation.
Soil Dynamics and Earth-
quake Engineering
,
26
(1), 15-30.
Blong, R. 2003. A review of damage intensity scales.
Natural Hazards
,
29
(1),
57-73.
Boissonnade, A.C, and Shah, H.C. 1985. Use of Patter Recognition and Fuzzy Sets
in Seismic Risk Analysis. Report 67, Stanford, California: John A. Blume Earth-
quake Engineering Center.
Boone, S.J. 1996. Ground-movement-related building damage.
Journal of Geotechni-
cal Engineering
,
122
(11), 886-896.
Bouckaert, R.R. 1995.
Bayesian Belief Networks: from Construction to Inference
.
PhD thesis, University of Utrecht.
Bouckaert, R.R.
et al.
2011.
WEKA Manual for Version 3-7-5
. October 28, 2011.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search