Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
z
)
=
[9.33]
t
with which, [9.32] becomes:
β
d
θ
d
d
θ
=
D
[9.34]
θ d
2
d
β
d
β
β
which is now an ordinary differential equation. Its solution gives β(θ) profiles that
are independent of z and t . This can be experimentally verified if water contents
measured during an infiltration test at different times and for different positions are
gathered on the same profile plotted versus β.
Inverting [9.33] gives:
z
=
)
t
[9.35]
that straightforwardly explains the √ t evolution observed for the wetting front
position z : the evolution is because infiltration is a diffusion phenomenon for which
[9.34] is valid. The total amount of water I(t) that has penetrated the sample at time t
can be calculated by integrating the water content profile θ( z ) inside the sample:
m
(
t
)
z
θ
[
]
max
0
2
I
(
t
)
[kg/m
]
=
=
ρ
θ
(
z
)
θ
.
dz
=
ρ
z
(
θ
).
d
θ
[9.36]
l
i
l
s
0
θ
i
with:
s : infiltrating surface [m 2 ];
z max : sample height [m];
θ i : uniform initial sample water content; and
θ 0 : water content at the bottom of the sample ( z = 0). Normally equal to porosity.
Substituting [9.35] into [3.36], we get:
ρ θ
θ
=
0
I
(
t
)
β
(
).
d
θ
t
=
ρ
S
t
=
A
t
[9.37]
l
l
c
i
This equation shows that I(t) must also be a function of √ t , and gives a physical
significance to the A coefficient that, moreover, can be related to water diffusivity
D θ by [KUT 94]:
Search WWH ::




Custom Search