Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Proof. We have
2 n
2
1
P i,j ( τ, L )=
P i,j ( τ, k, L )
2 n
1
k =0
2 n
2
L− 1
1
ω s i ( k⊕t⊕τ ) −s j ( k⊕t )
=
2 n
1
k =0
t =0
2 n
L
1
2
1
ω s i ( k⊕t⊕τ ) −s j ( k⊕t )
=
2 n
1
t =0
k =0
L− 1
1
L
=
C i,j ( τ )=
1 C i,j ( τ ) ,
2 n
1
2 n
t =0
where after interchanging the summations the resulting inner sum is clearly a
full period correlation sum which is independent of t.
It is of interest in applications to consider only the nontrivial periodic auto-
correlation function, i.e., i = j, τ
=0(mod2 n
1), for estimating the false
self-synchronisation probability. Before addressing this, we need a definition.
Definition 4. We define the Standard Normalized Correlation Distribution for
aquantity θ ( τ ) as:
1. If n =2 t +1 , then
2 n
1 ,
1 time,
1+2 t + ω 2 t , 2 n− 2 +2 t− 1
times,
1+2 t
ω 2 t , 2 n− 2 +2 t− 1
θ ( τ )=
times,
2 t + ω 2 t , 2 n− 2
2 t− 1
1
times,
2 t
ω 2 t , 2 n− 2
2 t− 1
1
times.
2. If n =2 t, then
2 n
1 ,
1 time,
1+2 t ,
2 n− 2 +2 t− 1
times,
2 t ,
2 n− 2
2 t− 1
θ ( τ )=
1
times,
1+ ω 2 t , 2 n− 2
times,
ω 2 t , 2 n− 2
1
times.
This definition is used in the proof below. The result follows from arguments
along the lines of [1] but the autocorrelation distribution was never computed
there; in that paper, the focus was on the global correlation distribution.
Lemma 5. For Family A the full period autocorrelation function obeys:
1. If we consider the zero divisor sequence (binary m -sequence), then
C i,i ( τ )= 2 n
1 , 1 time,
2 n
1 ,
2 times.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search