Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
where f 1 ( z ) ,...,f n ( z )
IF [ z ]. Conversely, any polynomial column vector c ( z )
IF [ z ] m completely determines an associated element in Λ given by
| Λ := T ( z ) c ( z )
.
Pol( T ( z ) c ( z ))
c ( z ) z −N− 1
σ ( c ( z ))
For 1
i
m ,let
S i ( Λ )=
{
γ
Λ : θ ( γ )
[ β i ]
}
and
IF [ z ] m : c ( z )isan N th right i -annihilating polynomial
column vector of T
Γ i ( T )=
{
c ( z )
}
.
Furthermore, we define a natural ordering, namely, both S i ( Λ )and Γ i ( T )are
ordered by the valuation of an element in them.
Theorem 2. The mapping η restricted on S i ( Λ ) is an order-preserving one-to-
one correspondence from S i ( Λ ) to Γ i ( T ) for 1
i
m,andσ restricted on
Γ i ( T ) is its inverse.
Proof. Denote η restricted on S i ( Λ )by η
| S i ( Λ ) , σ restricted on Γ i ( T )by σ
| Γ i ( T ) ,
respectively. First we need to show that η
| S i ( Λ ) is well-defined. For any vector
γ
S i ( Λ ), we have
γ = T ( z ) η ( γ )
.
Pol( T ( z ) η ( γ ))
η ( γ ) z −N− 1
Since γ
S i ( Λ ), we have v ( T ( z ) η ( γ )
Pol( T ( z ) η ( γ )))
≤−
N
1+ v ( η ( γ ))
and so η ( γ )
Γ i ( T ). Similarly σ
| Γ i ( T ) is well-defined. It is easy to check that
η
| S i ( Λ ) σ
| Γ i ( T ) =1 Γ i ( T ) and σ
| Γ i ( T ) η
| S i ( Λ ) =1 S i ( Λ ) . For any two elements γ 1 2
S i ( Λ )with v ( γ 1 )
v ( γ 2 ), we have v ( η ( γ 1 ))
v ( η ( γ 2 )) for all 1
i
m .
Theorem 3. Let ω 1 ,
···
p + m be a normal basis for Λ.Thenη ( ω p + i ) , 1
i
m,isanNth right i-minimal polynomial column vector of T .
Proof. By Theorem 2, it suces to show that ω p + i is a minimal element in
S i ( Λ )for1
i
m . Suppose there exists a vector γ
S i ( Λ ) such that v ( γ ) <
v ( ω p + i )forsome i ,1
i
m .Inviewof γ
Λ ,wecanwrite γ = f 1 ( z ) ω 1 +
···
+ f n ( z ) ω n with f j ( z )
IF [ z ]for 1
j
n .Since θ ( ω 1 ) ,
···
( ω n )are
linearly independent over IF and by convention deg(0) =
−∞
,wehave v ( γ )=
max
{
v ( ω j )+deg( f j ( z )) : 1
j
n
}
.Let I ( γ )=
{
1
j
n : v ( ω j )+
deg( f j ( z )) = v ( γ )
and so f p + i ( z ) = 0 because of v ( γ ) <v ( ω p + i ). Let lc( f ( x ))
denote the leading coe cient of a polynomial f ( x ). Thus it follows that
θ ( γ )=
j∈I ( γ )
}
lc( f j ( z )) θ ( ω j ) /
[ β i ] ,
a contradiction with γ
S i ( Λ ).
Search WWH ::




Custom Search