Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Since 2 n−r
is a period of S 1 and S 2 ,wehave d H ( S 1 , S 2 )=2 r
d H ( S 1 , S 2 )=
·
2 r +1 . This completes the proof of the theorem.
t
·
B Proof of Theorem 3
We assume
2 n
0 <L
(49)
since the result holds trivially for L =0.
Suppose (
A
( L )+ E i 1 ,··· ,i t 1 )
(
A
( L )+ E j 1 ,··· ,j t 2 )
=
. So there exists sequences
S , S
= S + E j 1 ,··· ,j t 2 . This implies that
A ( L ) such that S + E i 1 ,··· ,i t 1
= S .
S + E i 1 ,··· ,i t 1 + E j 1 ,··· ,j t 2
(50)
Consider the corresponding polynomials of S and S given by
x ) 2 n
x ) 2 n
−L a ( x )and S ( x )=(1
−L a ( x ) ,
S ( x )=(1
(51)
where a (1) = a (1) = 1. From equations (49) and (51) we have
x 2 n ) , S ( x )+ S ( x ))) > 2 n
deg(gcd((1
L.
(52)
From equations (50) and (52) we have
x 2 n ) ,x i 1 +
+ x i t 1 + x j 1 +
+ x j t 2 )) > 2 n
deg(gcd((1
···
···
L.
(53)
To prove the theorem we first show that every sequence in
A
( L )+ E i 1 ,··· ,i t 1
is in
A
( L )+ E j 1 ,··· ,j t 2 .Considerany R ∈A
( L ) with the corresponding polynomial
x ) 2 n
−L b ( x ) ,
R ( x )=(1
where
b (1) = 1 .
(54)
Then let R = R + E i 1 ,··· ,i t 1
+ E j 1 ,··· ,j t 2
with the corresponding polynomial
R ( x ). By equations (53) and (54) we have
deg(gcd((1 − x 2 n ) , R ( x )))
= deg(gcd((1
x ) 2 n , R ( x )+ x i 1 +
+ x i t 1 + x j 1 +
+ x j t 2 ))
(55)
···
···
=2 n
L.
From equation (55) using the definition of linear complexity we have R ∈A
( L ),
which implies
A
( L )+ E i 1 ,··· ,i t 1 ⊆A
( L )+ E j 1 ,··· ,j t 2 . By symmetry
A
( L )+
E j 1 ,··· ,j t 2 ⊆A
( L )+ E i 1 ,··· ,i t 1 , which proves the theorem.
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search