Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Proof. First we enumerate the disjoint sets in
A
( L )+
E 1 . By equation (33) we
have
2 n
2 n−r 1 +1 <L< 2 n
2 n−r 1 .
(38)
Using Theorem 3 and Lemma 5, from equation (38) we have
2 n−r 1 +1
(
A
( L )+ E u )
(
A
( L )+ E v )=
,
0
u<v
1 ,
(39)
, 2 n−r 1 +1
and for u =0 ,
···
1,
, 2 r 1 1
A
( L )+ E u =
A
( L )+ E u + t 2 n r 1 +1 ,
t =0 ,
···
1 .
(40)
Thus, from equation (39) there are 2 n−r 1 +1 disjoint sets
A
( L )+ E i , E i D 1 ( L ),
in
A
( L )+
E 1 . To obtain the disjoint sets in
A
( L )+
E 2 ,weonlyhavetoenumerate
the disjoint sets in
A
( L )+
D 2 ( L ) because from equation (40) we have
A
( L )+
2 n−r 1 +1
E i,j,i + u 2 n r 1 +1 ,j + v 2 n r 1 +1 =
A
( L ), for 0
i<j
1, 0
u, v
2 r 1 1
1.
From Theorem 3, we know that
A
( L )+ E i,j =
A
( L )+ E k,l if and only if there
exists a sequence S ∈A
( L ) such that the new sequence S + E i,j,k,l ∈A
( L ).
Hence we observe that doubly counted sets in
A
( L )+
D 2 ( L ) arise if only if there
2 n−r 1 +1
exist integers i , j , k ,and l ,0
1, that are in the second
form of Theorem 2. Exactly all such i , j , k ,and l are derived as part of the
proof of Theorem 2 and are enumerated in equation (25). Here we repeat the
enumeration for clarity. Integers i , j , k ,and l ,0
i, j, k, l
2 n−r 1 +1
i, j, k, l
1, that
are in the second form of Theorem 2 are
i = u + g 1 2 n−r 2 ,
j = u + g 2 2 n−r 2 ,
k = i +2 n−r 1 ,
l = j +2 n−r 1 ,
(41)
where
2 n−r 2
2 r 2 −r 1
u
g 1 <g 2
1 .
0
1and0
(42)
From equations (41) and (42) there are exactly 2 n−r 2 2 r 2 r 1
2
distinct pairs
2 n−r 1 +1
i , j and hence distinct sets
{
i, j, k, l
}
such that 0
i, j, k, l
1and
A
( L )+ E i,j,k,l =
( L ).
Hence for all settings of i and j in equation (41) we have the set equalities
A
A
( L )+ E i,j =
A
( L )+ E i +2 n r 1 ,j +2 n r 1
(43)
and
A
( L )+ E i,j +2 n r 1 =
A
( L )+ E i +2 n r 1 ,j .
(44)
, 2 n−r 2
1, we have 2 r 2 −r 1
Also, for each u =0 ,
···
1 set equalities
i = u + t 2 n−r 2
A
( L )+ E u,u +2 n r 1 =
A
( L )+ E i,i +2 n r 1 ,
where
(45)
2 r 2 −r 1
for 1
1.
By the settings of i and j in equation (41), the set equalities in equations
(43) and (44) result in 2 n−r 2 (2
t
· 2 r 2 r 1
2
) doubly counted sets in
A
( L )+
D 2 ( L )
2
, 2 n−r 2
enumerated as
A
( L )+
D
u ( L ), u =0 ,
···
1. Similarly, the set equalities
Search WWH ::




Custom Search