Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
when assuming only trivial linear dependencies. However, we thing that it is
easier to use Theorem 2 as one can plug in the numbers for a particular system
and do the simple arithmetic to get the expected number of linearly independent
equations. To find the same thing using Theorem 3, one needs to expand a com-
plicated series to find the coecient of a particular term. We start by computing
the D 'th degree coecient in the series from Theorem 3
Proposition 1
[ t D ] p ( t )=[ t D ]
1
n 1
m
t 2
t k
1
1
t
1
t
1
t 2 k
1) i m + i
D−ik
n
j
.
= k
i =0
1
(
i
j =0
= l =0 t l . The second
1
1 −t
Proof The first fraction in p ( t ) can be written as
fraction can be expressed as 1 −t 2
1
n =(1+ t ) n = j =0 j t j .Thethirdfrac-
−t
tion can be expressed as 1 −t k
1 −t 2 k m =(1
t k )) −m . By [8], this is equal to
(
1) i m + i− 1
i
t ik . Since we are only interested in [ t D ] p ( t )where D
i =0 (
n ,we
can cut away terms of degree higher than D in the three sums to get
[ t D ] p ( t )=[ t D ] D
t l
t j
t ik
n
j
1) i m + i
D
k
D
1
=
(
i
l =0
j =0
i =0
t ik
n
j
1) i m + i
D
k
D
l
1
.
[ t D ]
t l
(
i
l =0
j =0
i =0
We are looking for the coecient of the D 'th degree term, so we need only
multiply the two sums together with the constraint l = D
ik .Takingawaythe
sum over l , substituting D
ik for l in the rest of the first sum and multiplying
together we get the desired expression for the D 'th degree coecient.
The number D is the maximum degree of a monomial when running the XL
algorithm. Relating this to our notation we have D = D e + D m and k = D e .We
then get the following result.
Corollary 1. Let D = D e + D m and k = D e ,then
I =[ t D ]
1
n 1
m
t 2
t k
1
T
1
t
1
t
1
t 2 k
is equivalent to
D
D e
1) i m + i
i +1
D m −ik
n
j
.
I =
(
i =0
j =0
Search WWH ::




Custom Search