Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
1:1
AOB 2
1:2
Fig. 4. Digraph PD ( q, m )for q =3, m =2
AOB m ). The obtained digraph is denoted by PD ( q, m ) . Thus, the incoming
arrows to AOB m in PD ( q, m ) is the incoming arrows to A m in PD ( q, m ) ,and
outgoing arrows from AOB m are those from B m in PD ( q, m ) . This digraph has
no multiple arrows.
Lemma 3. Suppose m
2 . There is a natural q ! to 1 mapping
( PD ( q, m ))
( PD ( q, m )) .
E
→E
As a corollary, we have
E ( PD ( q, m )) = q ! E ( PD ( q, m )) .
Proof. Let C be an Eulerian circuit of PD ( q, m ). Let C be a cyclic sequence
of arrows of PD ( q, m ) obtained by simply removing the q arrows from A m to
B m from C .Since A m and B m are contracted in PD ( q, m ), C is a circuit,
and easily seen to be an Eulerian circuit. Conversely, if we fix C ,then C is
obtained by adding an arrow from A m to B m at each place in C where C goes
over AOB m . Thus, this mapping is q !to1.
Note that the above does not hold for m =1,since E ( PD ( q, 1)) = ( q
1)!.
Lemma 4
L ( PD ( q, m )) = PD ( q, m +1) .
Proof. Note that these graphs have no multiple arrows. As for the vertex sets,
V ( L ( PD ( q, m ))) := A ( PD ( q, m ))
is obtained from A ( PD ( q, m )) = P ( q, m )byremoving A m +1 ,O m +1 ,B m +1 and
adding an element named AB m +1 . By identifying AB m +1 with AOB m +1
Search WWH ::




Custom Search