Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
12
Proof of Entry 5 in Table 2
Follows from Three and Four. Details omitted.
13
Proof of Entry 8 in Table 2
The folowing theorem, which is a straightforward generalization of Stanley's
Thorem 5.1.4 [6], is nevertheless useful as a startign point for inverse multivari-
able multivariale Taylor series.
We begin by defining a q -chromatic partition of n to be a pair ( α, c )con-
sisting of partition α =
{{
α 1 ,...,α k }}
of n together with a coloring function
c :
[ q ].
Note that repeated parts of the partition need not have the same color, but
that, for example the partition
{{
α 1 ,...,α k }} →
of 2, could be 2-colored with one red 1
and one blue 1, both 1s red or both 1s blue, but that changing which 1 is red
and which 1 is blue does not make any distinction for a total of three possible
colorings.
Theorem. Multi-variable Compositional Formula
{{
1 , 1
}}
Let f 1 ,...,f q :
be functions with exponential generating functions
F 1 ,...,F q respectively. Assume that f 1 [0] =
P C
q
···
= f q [0] = 0, and let g :
N
K
be such that g [0 ,..., 0] = 0. Let h :
N
K have h [0] = 0 and for all n
0,
l ( α )
h [ n ]=
f c ( α i ) (
|
α i |
) g (
k
) ,
i =1
where the sum is over all colored set partitions ( α, c )of[ n ]and
k
=( k 1 ,...,k q )
is such that k j is the number of parts of ( α, c ) of color j . Then,
H ( z )= G ( F 1 ( x ) ,...,F q ( x )) .
q , and assume (without loss of generality) that any colored
set partition is such that we have all parts of color 1 listed first, followed by all
parts of color 2 and so forth, ending with all parts of color q .Wecanthenuse
Table 2, entry 1, with k 1 +
Proof:
Fix
k N
+ k q functions to prove the theorem. In table 2,
entry 1, let the functions that tell us the coecients of the exponential generating
functions be a 1 ,...,a k 1 + ··· + k q
···
a 1 =
···
= a k 1 = f 1 ,
a k 1 +1 =
···
= a k 1 + k 2 = f 2 ,
and so on, up to
a k 1 + ··· + k q− 1 =
···
= a k 1 + ··· + k q = f q .
Search WWH ::




Custom Search