Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 3
Comparing Models 1 and 2
Data
E SA
E PT
Model 1
Model 2
Model 1
Model 2
Rat4 Right
15.58
18.42
57.49
43.75
Rat4 Left
14.38
17.95
54.75
42.15
Rat5 Right
10.67
13.06
49.83
36.32
Rat5 Left
12.24
17.64
53.86
39.90
Rat6 Right
8.59
10.43
43.81
31.65
Rat6 Left
8.31
10.33
45.08
30.81
Rat7 Right
15.47
18.48
52.99
43.25
Rat7 Left
10.83
12.69
46.86
35.43
Rat8 Right
10.15
12.28
50.13
33.55
Rat8 Left
13.31
15.66
53.45
38.10
Rat12 Right
7.66
8.21
38.22
26.74
Rat12 Left
8.62
10.23
38.71
27.89
Rat13 Right
12.80
13.92
50.29
35.64
Rat13 Left
13.39
16.26
55.49
39.03
Total
161.99
195.56
690.97
504.21
Fig. 5 Adipose cell-size distribution fit with Model 1: Here we show both the adipose cell-size
distribution from experimental data (in pink for the right side and light blue for the left side) and
the corresponding fit using Model 1 (red
and dark blue, respectively)
of predictive mathematical models by Hall and collaborators [ 33 ] and others.
Apart from transient effects on body composition due to changes in glycogen and
water, the fat mass change predicted by these dynamic models of adipose tissue
Search WWH ::




Custom Search