Travel Reference
In-Depth Information
TABLE 5
Regression analysis: prediction of perceived overall investment conditions.
Variables
Kyrgyzstan
Kazakhstan
Uzbekistan
Turkmenistan
b coeff. (sig.)
b coeff. (sig.)
b coeff. (sig.)
b coeff. (sig.)
Investment consideration
General investment conditions
.218
.642*
0.068
-.371*
(148)
(.000)
(0.649)
(.028)
Incentives
-.268*
-222
.000
.105
(.071)
(.137)
(1.000)
(.517)
Workforce conditions
.575*
(.000)
(-.062)
(.599)
.354*
(.004)
.573*
(.000)
Tourism specific investment
consideration
Areas of direct tourism facili-
ties
.159
.044
.045
.176
(.196)
(.723)
(.712)
(.198)
Areas of tourism support fa-
cilities
-.375*
-.048
.192
.078
(.019)
(.758)
(.219)
(.651)
Sustainability investment con-
sideration
Positive investment conditions
for sustainability
-.216
.145
-.310*
-.141
(.139)
(.322)
(.036)
(.380)
Attractive Investment cost
.443*
.442*
.544*
.240*
(.001)
(.001)
(.000)
(.078)
Adjusted R 2
0.456
0.448
0.458
0.335
F-test value
8.194
7.946
8.248
5.314
F-test sig.
.00
.00
.00
.00
Dependent variable: overall investment condition; 1 - not good condition at all, 2 -
slightly good condition, 3 - somewhat good, 4 - good, and 5 - very good.
“*” indicates significant level at 0.05 or better probability level.
REGRESSION ANALYSIS
In order to further understand and predict overall investment condi-
tions for each of the four CAS countries—Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan,
Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan (as a function of general investment,
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search