Assessment of Risk Studies and Severe Nuclear Accidents - The Risks of Nuclear Energy Technology - page 230

8. Kessler G (2002) Requirements for nuclear energy in the 21st century. Nuclear energy as a
sustainable energy source. Prog Nucl Energy 60(3-4):309-325
9. (1975) Reactor safety study: an assessment of accidents risks in US Commercial Nuclear
Power Plants. In: Rasmussen NC (ed) US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, WASH-1400
(NUREG-75/014), Washington
10. Deutsche Risikostudie Kernkraftwerke Phase A (1980) Gesellschaft f¨r Reaktorsicherheit
(GRS). Verlag T ¨ V Rheinland
11. Ehrhardt J et al (1982) Der Einsatz des Unfallfolgenmodells der “Deutschen Risikostudie
Kernkraftwerke” bei Risikoabsch¨tzungen zu verschiedenen Reaktortypen,

KfK-Nachrichten, Jahrg. 14-4:269-277
12. Bayer A, Heuser FW (1981) Basic aspects and results of the German Risk Study. Nucl Saf
22:695-709
13. Erhardt J et al (1989) Radioactivity release and health consequences by filtered containment
venting. In: SMIRT seminar: containment of nuclear reactors, Los Angeles, USA,

10-15 August 1989
14. Qu J (1992) Konsequenzen und Wirksamkeit von Umsiedlungsmaß-nahmen nach
kerntechnischen Unf ¨ llen, KfK 4990
15. Gemeinsame Empfehlung von RSK und GPR f ¨ r Sicherheitsanforderungen an zuk ¨ nftige
Kernkraftwerke mit Druckwasserreaktoren, Bundesanzeiger Nr. 218, 20. November 1993
16. IPSN-GRS Proposals for the development of technical guidelines for future PWRs (1998) vol
5. Structuring GPR-RSK Recommendations as Guidelines, Common report IPSN/GRS
No. 42. Institut de Protection et de Suret´ Nucl´aire, Saclay, France, Gesellschaft f¨r
Reaktorsicherheit, Garching, Germany
17. Corradini ML et al (1988) Vapor explosion in light water reactors: a review of theory and
modelling. Prog Nucl Energy 22:1-117
18. Magallon D (2005) FCI phenomena uncertainties impacting predictability of dynamic load-
ing of reactor structures (from OECD SERENA programme). In: PSA-2 Workshop, Aix-en-
Provence, 7-9 November 2005
19. Berman M, Beck DF (1989) Steam explosion triggering and propagation: hypothesis and
evidence. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international seminar on containment and nuclear
reactors, UCLA, Los Angeles, 10-11 August 1989 (SNL report SAND89-1878C)
20. The SL-1 Reactor Accident. http://www.radiationworks.com/photos/sl1reactor1.htm ; http://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SL-1
21. Consideration of BORAX-type reactivity accidents applied to research reactors. IRSH Report
2010/128. Institut de Radioprotection et de Sˆret´ Nucl´aire, 08/2011
22. Jacobs H et al (1994) Untersuchungen zur Dampfexplosion, PSF Statusbericht 23. M¨rz 1994
KfK 5326, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, 214-232
23. Cronenberg AW, Benz R (1980) Vapour explosion phenomena with respect to nuclear reactor
safety assessment. Adv Nucl Sci Technol 12:247-335
24. Fletcher DF, Anderson RP (1990) A review of pressure-induced propagation models of the
vapour explosion process. Prog Nucl Energy 23:137-179
25. Board SJ et al (1975) Detonation of coolant explosions. Nature 254(3):319-321
26. Diab A et al (2000) Long-term validation of the molten fuel-moderator interactions model.
Nucl Technol 169:114-125
27. Kolev MI (1999) In-vessel melt water interaction caused by core support plate failure under
molten pool. In: 7th International conference on nuclear engineering, Tokyo, Japan (ICONE
7360)
28. Berthoud G (2000) Vapor explosions. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32:573-611
29. Struwe D et al (1999) Consequence evaluation of in-vessel fuel coolant interaction in the
European Pressurized Water Reacto, FZKA 6316, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe
30. Allison M et al (1993) SCDAP/RELAP5 mod3.1 code manual, vol I-IV. NUREG/CR-6150,
EGG-2720