Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
bind IgG and C3bi respectively (
Caron and Hall, 1998
). Importantly EPEC and
EHEC colonize gut epithelium but remain predominantly extracellular. Indeed
EPEC is able not only to block its own uptake by professional phagocytes (
cis-
phagocytosis), but is able also to inhibit the phagocytosis of IgG-opsonized par-
ticles (
trans
-phagocytosis) (
Goosney et al., 1999
;
Celli et al., 2001
;
Quitard
et al., 2006
). Inhibition of both
cis-
and
trans-
phagocytosis is T3SS dependent.
The first T3SS effector to be identified as responsible for inhibition of
phagocytosis was EspF (
Quitard et al., 2006
;
Marches et al., 2008
). EPEC
espF
mutants are phagocytosed by mouse-derived macrophages to the same
extent as EPEC lacking a functional T3SS (
Quitard et al., 2006
;
Marches
et al., 2008
). The role of EspF in inhibition of phagocytosis seems to be corre-
lated with its ability to inhibit PI3K (
Quitard et al., 2006
). The antiphagocytic
activity of EspF is due to the N-terminal region that also contains binding
sites for actin, profilin, and SNX9 (
Quitard et al., 2006
;
Alto et al., 2007
;
Peralta-Ramirez et al., 2008
). These partner proteins have not been shown to
be involved in antiphagocytosis, but as a specific mechanism for EspF activity
still remains to be elucidated, their involvement cannot be discounted. EspF
was shown to block only
cis-
and FcγR-dependent phagocytosis (
Marches
et al., 2008
).
EspB binds the actin-binding domain of multiple myosin family members
(
Iizumi et al., 2007
). Myosins (myosin-1c, -2, -5, -6, and -10) are involved in
phagocytosis as they localize at the phagocytic cup and their inhibition sup-
presses phagocytocis (
Swanson et al., 1999
). Furthermore, early reports have
shown that tropomysin is recruited at the site of EPEC adherence (
Goosney
et al., 2001
). Through its interaction with myosins EspB can compete with actin
to bind myosins at the actin-binding domain and may then interfere with myo-
sin-induced phagosome constriction. An internal region of EspB (amino acids
159-218) was identified as responsible for this interaction (
Iizumi et al., 2007
)
and deletion of this region reduced the ability of EPEC to inhibit phagocytosis
but was not required for bacterial adherence or delivery of T3SS effectors point-
ing to a specific role in antiphagocytosis (
Iizumi et al., 2007
).
A recently identified effector involved in inhibition of phagocytosis is EspH,
which blocks the activation of Rho GTPases by binding DH-PH Rho GEFs
(
Dong et al., 2010
). The impact of EspH on actin cytoskeleton dynamics is
reflected at the level of phagocytosis as Rho GTPases control cytoskeleton
remodeling during FcγR-dependent phagocytosis (
Caron and Hall, 1998
) and
EPEC
espH
mutants have a reduced ability to inhibit FcγR-dependent phago-
cytosis (
Dong et al., 2010
).
Uniquely, EspJ alone can inhibit both FcγR- and CR3-dependent phagocyto-
sis (
Marches et al., 2008
). EspJ expression appears to only block phagocytosis of
opsonized particles (
trans
-phagocytosis) but not self-uptake (
cis
- phagocytosis).
Similarly to EspF, translocated EspJ localizes to mitochondria (
Kurushima
et al., 2010
) but this does not preclude a role for EspJ at the phagocytic cup. The
mechanism by which EspJ blocks phagocytosis is currently unknown.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search