Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
The gene products of the
per
operon, PerA, PerB, and PerC, directly augment
transcription of BFP genes (
Tobe et al., 1999
) and of a second transcriptional
activator, Ler that in turn regulates additional EPEC genes involved in type 3
secretion (T3S) (
Elliott et al., 2000
) (see Chapter 4). Additionally, BFP receptor
binding and retraction induce transient up-regulation of
bfp
transcription and
down-regulates expression of Ler-induced virulence genes (
Humphries et al.,
2010
). Retraction of BFP fibers is also required for efficient translocation of
effector molecules secreted by this pathway (
Zahavi et al., 2011
).
Bacterial stress response pathways play an important role in regulating the
expression of virulence factors in Gram-negative pathogens and the BFP is no
exception (
Nevesinjac and Raivio, 2005
;
MacRitchie et al., 2008
;
Vogt et al.,
2010
;
Lieberman et al., 2012
). In the case of the BFP system, full activation of
the Cpx envelope stress response pathway represses transcription of BFP genes
and inhibits pilus expression (
Vogt et al., 2010
). However, complete inactiva-
tion of the Cpx pathway in EPEC eliminates pilus biogenesis (
Nevesinjac and
Raivio, 2005
) due to insufficient levels of periplasmic chaperone proteins such
as DegP, CpxP, and DsbA (
Vogt et al., 2010
). A previous study revealed DsbA
was required for stability of bundlin and BFP biogenesis (
Zhang and Donnen-
berg, 1996
). BFP can be expressed in K12
E. coli
when the cloned
bfp
operon
is placed under control of a strong promoter (
Stone et al., 1996
), but sufficient
BFP production to allow associated phenotypes requires constitutive activation
of Cpx (
Price and Raivio, 2009
).
STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF T2S AND T4P MACHINES
Introduction
The T2S and T4P machines are structurally and functionally homologous (
Craig
et al., 2004
;
Ayers et al., 2009
;
Korotkov et al., 2012
). These complexes can be
conceptualized as consisting of three distinct subcomplexes: the inner mem-
brane (IM) subassembly associated with at least one cytoplasmic ATPase; the
OM subassembly which consists of a transmembrane pore; and the translocated
substrate. Remarkably few differences between the T2S and T4P machines
account for their capacity to process very different substrates: the T2S extrudes
fully folded proteins likely driven through the pore by a pseudopilus while
the T4P system substrate is itself a pilus. Variations and accessory proteins do
exist and are discussed after the conserved components. All components are
listed using the General Secretory Pathway (Gsp) nomenclature used for ETEC
(
Table 13.1
).
The IM subassembly
The IM subassemblies of both the T2S and T4P machines consist of a core
set of homologous components, including several integral IM proteins and a
hexameric ATPase that provides the energy driving secretion (
Pelicic, 2008
).
Search WWH ::
Custom Search