Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
1
1
1
1
φ
P
ni
=
P
nx
+
P
ny
−
φ
φ
φ
P
o
where P
ni
= nominal axial load strength for a column subjected to an axial load P
u
at eccentricities e
x
and e
y
P
nx
= nominal axial load strength for a column subjected to an axial load P
u
at eccentricity of e
x
only
(e
y
= 0)
P
ny
= nominal axial load strength for a column subjected to an axial load P
u
at eccentricity e
y
only
(e
x
= 0)
P
o
= nominal axial load strength for a column subjected to an axial load P
u
at eccentricity of zero (i.e.,
e
x
= e
y
= 0)
= 0.85 › (A
g
-A
st
) + f
y
A
st
The above equation can be rearranged into the following form:
1
φ
P
ni
=
1
1
1
φ
P
nx
+
P
ny
−
φ
φ
P
o
In design, P
u
<
φ
P
ni
where P
u
is the factored axial load acting at eccentricities e
x
and e
y
. This method is most
P
ny
are greater than the corresponding balanced axial loads; this is usually the case for
typical building columns.
suitable when
φ
P
nx
and
φ
An iterative design process will be required when using this approximate equation for columns subjected to
biaxial loading. A trial section can be obtained from Figs. 5-18 through 5-25 with the factored axial load P
u
and
the total factored moment taken as M
u
= M
ux
+ M
uy
where M
ux
= P
u
e
x
and M
uy
= P
u
e
y
. The expression for
P
ni
can then be used to check if the section is adequate or not. Usually, only an adjustment in the amount of rein-
forcement will be required to obtain an adequate or more economical section.
φ
5.5.3.1 Example: Simplified Design of a Column Subjected to Biaxial Loading
Determine the size and reinforcement for a corner column subjected to P
u
= 360 kips, M
ux
= 50 ft-kips, and M
uy
= 25 ft-kips.
(1)
Trial section
From Fig. 5-20 with P
u
= 360 kips and M
u
= 50 + 25 = 75 ft-kips, select a 14
×
14 in. column with 4-
No.9 bars.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search