Open Licensing—Advanced Sharing - Open-Source Lab: How to Build Your Own Hardware and Reduce Research Costs - page 47

6. Lemley MA. Intellectual property and shrinkwrap licenses. South Calif Law Rev .
1994;68(1):1239-1294.
7. Goodman B. Honey, I shrink-wrapped the consumer: the shrink-wrap agreement as
an adhesion contract. Cardozo Law Rev . 1999;21:319.
8. Sims RR, Brinkmann J. Enron ethics (or: culture maters more than codes). J Bus Ethics .
2003;45(3):243-256.

9. Lerner J, Tirole J. Some simple economics of open source. J Ind Econ .

2002;50(2):197-234.
10. Lerner J, Tirole J. The scope of open source licensing. J Law Econ Organ .
2005;21(1):20-56.
11. Stallman R. The GNU operating system and the free software movement. In: DiBona
C, Ockman S, Stone M, eds. Open sources: voices from the open source revolution . 1st ed.
Sebastopol, US: O'Reilly & Associates, Inc; 1999;53-70.
12. Free Software Foundation. The GNU general public license . 2013; GNU Project. [Retrieved
18.05.13], from: htp://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html ; 2013.
13. Bruns B. Open sourcing nanotechnology research and development: issues and oppor-
tunities. Nanotechnology . 2001;12(3):198-210.
14. Perens B. The open source definition. In: DiBona C, Ockman S, Stone M, eds. Open
sources: voices from the open source revolution . 1st ed. Sebastopol, US: O'Reilly & Associ-
ates, Inc; 1999;171-188.
15. TAPR. The TAPR open hardware license . 2013; In: htp://www.tapr.org/ohl.html ; 2013.
16. Chumby HDK, chumby HDK license agreement 2013. Available from: ht-

tp://www.chumby.com/developers/agreement .
17. Seidle N. IP obesity . Available from: 2012; htp://www.sparkfun.com/news/963 ; 2012.
18. The Open Source Hardware Association. OSHW community survey . 2012; Available
from: htp://www.oshwa.org/oshw-community-survey-2012/#section4 ; 2012.
19. Zelenika I, Pearce JM. The internet and other ICTs as tools and catalysts for sustainable
development: innovation for 21st century. Inf Dev, in press. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/
0266666912465742 .
20. Brewer Eric, Demmer Michael, Du Bowei, et al. The case for technology in developing
regions. Computer . 2005;38(6):25-38.
21. James J. Low-cost information technology in developing countries: current opportunit-
ies and emerging possibilities. Habitat Int . 2002;26(1):21-31.

22. The open source hardware association. Definition. Available from: ht-

tp://www.oshwa.org/deinition/ .
23. Boldrin M, Levine DK. Against intellectual monopoly . Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press; 2008.
24. Mowery DC, Nelson RR, Sampat BN, Ziedonis AA. The growth of patenting and li-
li-censing by U.S universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980.
Res Policy . 2001;30:99-119.
25. Garfinkel SL, Stallman RM, Kapor M. Why patents are bad for software. In: Ludlow
P, ed. High noon on the electronic front: conceptual issues in cyberspace . Cambridge: MIT;
1999;35-46.
26. Heller MA, Eisenberg RS. Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomed-
ical research. Science . 1998;280:698-701.
27. Chesbrough H. Open business models: how to thrive in the new innovation landscape . Har-
vard Business School Press 2006.
28. Lemley MA. Patenting nanotechnology. Stanford Law Rev . 2005;58:601-630.