Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
plays, the consequence
x
1
=(movie
,
movie
,
movie
,
movie)
is in the weak core. To see this, we first list the opinions of the agents
in
n
1
. Given the evidences
E
=
{
(Director = Spielberg)
∧
(Type = S.F.)
}
,
we have
B
1
=
(see Table 3.2);
B
2
=
{
Good
}
(see Table 3.3).
{
Good
}
Let
C
be the defecting coalition in Definition 3.7. Without loss of
generality, let
C
=
{
A
1
}
.
By the agent preferences shown in Table 3.1, we see that both agents
A
1
and
A
2
prefer to see the movie. Therefore, we shall not be able to
find an consequence
x
, such that
x
is better than
x
1
for
A
1
and
x
1
is
not better than
x
for
A
1
, because seeing movie is the best consequence
for him. For the same reason, there is no better consequence than
x
1
for
A
1
.Hence,
x
1
=(movie
,
movie
,
movie
,
movie)
is in the weak core for the coalition
n
1
.
Example 3.20
Continuing from Example 3.19, we consider the con-
sequence
x
2
= (tennis
,
tennis
,
tennis
,
tennis)
.
This consequence is not in the the weak core. For example, consider
the coalition
C
2
=
{A
1
}.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search