Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
plays, the consequence
x 1 =(movie , movie , movie , movie)
is in the weak core. To see this, we first list the opinions of the agents
in n 1 . Given the evidences
E =
{
(Director = Spielberg)
(Type = S.F.)
}
,
we have
B 1 =
(see Table 3.2);
B 2 = { Good } (see Table 3.3).
{
Good
}
Let C be the defecting coalition in Definition 3.7. Without loss of
generality, let
C =
{
A 1 }
.
By the agent preferences shown in Table 3.1, we see that both agents
A 1 and A 2 prefer to see the movie. Therefore, we shall not be able to
find an consequence x , such that x is better than x 1 for A 1 and x 1 is
not better than x for A 1 , because seeing movie is the best consequence
for him. For the same reason, there is no better consequence than x 1
for A 1 .Hence,
x 1 =(movie , movie , movie , movie)
is in the weak core for the coalition n 1 .
Example 3.20
Continuing from Example 3.19, we consider the con-
sequence
x 2 = (tennis , tennis , tennis , tennis) .
This consequence is not in the the weak core. For example, consider
the coalition
C 2 = {A 1 }.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search