Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
These were tabulated and histograms of the distribution of these valence terms,
for each unique combination of pseudo-atoms, were generated (see Fig. 15a ).
These distributions were shown to be a single-model Gaussian distribution
for the bonds and angles, and multi-modal for dihedrals. The only exception
occurred when considering the bond distribution between the phosphate (PHO)
and sugar (SUG) pseudo-atoms, which was bi-modal. This anomaly is explained
by considering that starting at the 5' end, the SUG -
PHO bond length (4.4 ˚ )
>
SUG bond length (4.0 ˚ ). When constructing
the meso-model from the atomistic representation, if the backbone atoms are
alternatively labeled as PHO-SUG-PHP-SUS-PHO, this anomaly is effectively
resolved and the PHO-SUG, PHO-SUS, PHP-SUG, and PHP-SUS distributions
are uni-modal.
The parameters were obtained by performing a least squares fitting of a Gaussian
curve of the desired functional form. The fitting function is an exponential with
exponent equal to the relevant potential/2RT. For the bonds, the fitting function was
therefore y
is longer than the next PHO -
>
2
a 0 e 0 : 5 k r r 0
ð
Þ
=
2 RT
¼
. Table 2 gives the parameters obtained for the
various bond-stretch terms.
Fig. 15 Plots of (a) adenine-sugar bond distribution from atomistic MD and (b) adenine dimer
interaction energy. This includes the binding energy of the dimer as well as the interaction with the
water molecules
Table 2 Bond parameters for pseudo-beads
k 0 (kcal mol 1 ˚ 2 )
r 0 ( ˚ )
SUG-THY
167.848
4.2136
SUG-ADE
155.974
4.6175
SUG-GUA
143.419
4.7412
SUG-CYT
193.31
4.1101
SUG-PHO
46.0059
4.0053
PHP-SUG
18.2605
4.4283
Search WWH ::




Custom Search