Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
fresh-frozen (FF)
tissues and formalin-
xed
are issues that should be considered before
designing any MS-based biomarker study.
paraf
n-embedded (FFPE) tissues. A compar-
ison of the suitability of these two tissue types
for proteomic analysis is shown in Table 1 .
Formalin-Fixed Paraf
n-Embedded
Tissue
Although FF tissue remains the gold standard
for extraction and large-scale pro
Fresh and/or Fresh-Frozen Tissue
Fresh or FF tissue is the specimen of choice for
MS-based proteomics because proteins and
other biomolecules (i.e., metabolites, nucleic
acids) are unmodi
ling of proteins
and other biomolecules in vivo , 11 there is an
increasing interest in analyzing the protein
complement of FFPE tissues. 12 This interest is
primarily driven by the fact that the process of
creating FFPE tissues is the most common
technique for tissue processing, evaluation, diag-
nostics, immunoanalysis, preservation, and
archiving used by clinical and/or research
pathologists. It is estimated that worldwide,
more than a billion FFPE tissue samples are
stored in hospitals, tissue banks, and research
laboratories. 13 These archived FFPE tissues may
provide a wealth of information when used in
retrospective molecular
ed and preserved in their
natural tissue environment. The most commonly
used method is snap-freezing in liquid nitrogen
(LN 2 ). It provides excellent protein integrity
and a wide array of options for MS-based pro-
teomic pro
ling. Ideally, any tissue specimen
should be snap-frozen within
five minutes after
surgical removal, biopsy, or laboratory dissec-
tion. Upon acquisition, fresh tissue is placed
into a sterile cryovial, which is then tightly
capped and submerged in LN 2 for snap-
freezing. This vial is transferred from the tempo-
rary LN 2 transport container into a long-term
liquid nitrogen storage tank or in a freezer
at e 80 C. Fresh-frozen specimens are typically
processed and analyzed as tissue blocks, 3,7,8
thin tissue slices, 9 or laser capture microdissec-
tion (LCM) specimens. 10 It is important to note
that the availability and storage of FF tissues
studies
focused on
ling and biomarker research. 12
Thus, it is not surprising that signi
molecular pro
cant efforts
have been put into developing methods for
analyzing FFPE, exempli
ed by increasing
number of studies using this tissue type
for biomarker discovery by MS-based
proteomics. 14 e 18 Tissue specimens intended for
formalin
n embedding should
be trimmed to be approximately 0.5-cm-thick
blocks. The tissue should be
fixation and paraf
TABLE 1 Suitability of FF and FFPETissues forMolecular
Pro ling and Biomarker Development Using
MS-Based Proteomics
xed at room
temperature for a minimum of 24 hours, at which
point the tissue can be transferred to a histology
lab for embedding in paraf
FF
FFPE
in Similar to FF
tissue, FFPE tissue specimens are typically
received and processed as tissue blocks, 19 thin
tissue slices, 16 or LCM specimens. 18,20 However,
high-throughput proteomic studies using FFPE
tissues have been challenging, primarily because
of formaldehydeinduced protein crosslinks
during
Availability
D
DDD
Storage costs
DDD
D
Protein accessibility
DDD
DD
Protein quality
DDD
D
MS-based quantitation
accuracy
DDD
DD
fixation process. Therefore, a reversal of
the formaldehyde induced crosslinks and
protein adducts is mandatory for extracting
intact proteins prior to fractionation and/or
DDD
D
Protein immunoreactivity
Sample preparation costs
DD
DDD
Search WWH ::




Custom Search