Proteomic and Mass Spectrometry Technologies for Biomarker Discovery - Proteomic and Metabolomic Approaches to Biomarker Discovery

Biology Reference

In-Depth Information

MS1 extracted ion chromatograms in Skyline: appli-

cation to protein acetylation and phosphorylation. Mol

Cell Proteomics 2012;

proteomics uncovers kindlin-3 as an essential factor

for red blood cell function. Cell 2008;

(2):353 e 64.

90. Geiger T, Wisniewski JR, Cox J, Zanivan S, Kruger M,

Ishihama Y, et al. Use of stable isotope labeling by

amino acids in cell culture as a spike-in standard in

quantitative proteomics. Nat Protoc 2011;

134

(5):202 e 14.

78. Hoekman B, Breitling R, Suits F, Bischoff R,

Horvatovich P. msCompare: A framework for quan-

titative analysis of label-free LC-MS data for compar-

ative candidate biomarker studies. Mol Cell Proteomics

2012;

(2):147 e 57.

91. Asara JM, Christofk HR, Freimark LM, Cantley LC. A

label-free quanti

(6):M111.015974.

79. Zybailov B, Mosley AL, Sardiu ME, Coleman MK,

Florens L, Washburn MP. Statistical analysis of

membrane proteome expression changes in Saccharo-

myces cerevisiae. J Proteome Res 2006;

cation method by MS/MS TIC

compared to SILAC and spectral counting in a pro-

teomics screen. Proteomics 2008;

(5):994 e 9.

92. Yao X, Freas A, Ramirez J, Demirev PA, Fenselau C.

Proteolytic 18O labeling for comparative proteomics:

model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus. Anal

Chem 2001;

(9):2339 e 47.

80.

Ishihama Y, Oda Y, Tabata T, Sato T, Nagasu T,

Rappsilber J, et al. Exponentially modi

ed protein

abundance index (emPAI) for estimation of absolute

protein amount in proteomics by the number of

sequenced peptides per protein. Mol Cell Proteomics

2005;

(13):2836 e 42.

93. Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH,

Aebersold R. Quantitative analysis of complex protein

mixtures using isotope-coded af

nity tags. Nat Bio-

(9):1265 e 72.

81. Trudgian DC, Ridlova G, Fischer R, Mackeen MM,

Ternette N, Acuto O, et al. Comparative evaluation of

label-free SINQ normalized spectral index quantita-

tion in the central proteomics facilities pipeline. Pro-

teomics 2011;

(10):994 e 9.

94. Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN, Williamson B,

Parker K, Hattan S, et al. Multiplexed protein quanti-

tation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-

reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics

2004;

technol 1999;

(14):2790 e 7.

82. Schwanhausser B, Busse D, Li N, Dittmar G,

Schuchhardt J, Wolf J, et al. Global quanti

(12):1154 e 69.

95. Thompson A, Schafer J, Kuhn K, Kienle S, Schwarz J,

Schmidt G, et al. Tandem mass tags: a novel quanti-

cation of

mammalian gene expression control. Nature 2011;

473

fication strategy for comparative analysis of complex

protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal Chem 2003;

(7347):337 e 42.

83. Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Kristensen DB,

Steen H, Pandey A, et al. Stable isotope labeling by

amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and

accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell

Proteomics 2002;

(8):

1895 e 904.

96. Stahl-Zeng J, Lange V, Ossola R, Eckhardt K,

Krek W, Aebersold R, et al. High sensitivity detec-

tion of plasma proteins by multiple reaction moni-

toring of N-glycosites. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007;

(5):376 e 86.

84. Hanke S, Besir H, Oesterhelt D, Mann M. Absolute

SILAC for accurate quantitation of proteins in

complex mixtures down to the attomole level. J Pro-

teome Res 2008;

(10):1809 e 17.

97. Drabovich AP, Jarvi K, Diamandis EP. Veri

cation of

male infertility biomarkers in seminal plasma by

multiplex selected reaction monitoring assay. Mol Cell

Proteomics 2011;

(3):1118 e 30.

85. Sou

B, Kumar C, Gnad F, Mann M, Mijakovic I,

Macek B. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell

culture (SILAC) applied to quantitative proteomics of

Bacillus subtilis. J Proteome Res 2010;

(12):M110.004127.

98. Stergachis AB, MacLean B, Lee K, Stamato-

yannopoulos JA, MacCoss MJ. Rapid empirical

discovery of optimal peptides for targeted proteomics.

Nat Methods 2011;

(7):3638 e 46.

86. Gruhler A, Olsen JV, Mohammed S, Mortensen P,

Faergeman NJ, Mann M, et al. Quantitative phospho-

proteomics applied to the yeast pheromone signaling

pathway. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005;

(12):1041 e 3.

99. Pratt JM, Simpson DM, Doherty MK, Rivers J,

Gaskell SJ, Beynon RJ. Multiplexed absolute quantifi-

cation for proteomics using concatenated signature

peptides encoded by QconCAT genes. Nat Protoc 2006;

(3):310 e 27.

87. de Godoy LM, Olsen JV, de Souza GA, Li G,

Mortensen P, Mann M. Status of complete proteome

analysis by mass spectrometry: SILAC labeled yeast as

a model system. Genome Biol 2006;

(2):1029 e 43.

100. Drabovich AP, Diamandis EP. Combinatorial peptide

libraries facilitate development of multiple reaction

monitoring assays for low-abundance proteins. J Pro-

teome Res 2010;

(6):R50.

88. Sury MD, Chen JX, Selbach M. The SILAC

fly allows

cation in vivo. Mol Cell

for accurate protein quanti

(3):1236 e 45.

101. Deutsch EW, Lam H, Aebersold R. PeptideAtlas:

a resource for target selection for emerging targeted

proteomics work

(10):2173 e 83.

89. Kruger M, Moser M, Ussar S, Thievessen I, Luber CA,

Forner F, et al. SILAC mouse for quantitative

Proteomics 2010;

ows. EMBO Rep 2008;

(5):429 e 34.

Proteomic and Metabolomic Approaches to Biomarker Discovery

Search WWH ::

Custom Search

Home