A Role for ProteineProtein Interaction Networks in the Identification and Characterization of Potential Biomarkers - Proteomic and Metabolomic Approaches to Biomarker Discovery - page 338

45. Licata L, Briganti L, Peluso D, et al. MINT, the
molecular interaction database: 2012 update. Nucleic
Acids Res 2012; 40 (Database issue):D857 e 61.
46. Aranda B, Achuthan P, Alam-Faruque Y, et al. The
IntAct molecular interaction database in 2010. Nucleic
Acids Res 2010; 38 (Database issue):D525 e 31.
47. Pagel P, Kovac S, Oesterheld M, et al. The MIPS
mammalian protein e protein interaction database.
Bioinformatics 2005; 21 (6):832 e 4.
48. Stark C, Breitkreutz BJ, Reguly T, et al. BioGRID:
a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic
Acids Res 2006; 34 (Database issue):D535 e 9.
49. Keshava Prasad TS, Goel R, Kandasamy K, et al.
Human Protein Reference Database d 2009 update.
Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37 :D767 e 72.
50. Ooi HS, Schneider G, Chan YL, et al. Databases of
protein e protein interactions and complexes. Methods
Mol Biol 2010; 609 :145 e 59.
51. Cusick ME, Yu H, Smolyar A, et al. Literature-curated
protein interaction datasets. Nat Methods 2009; 6 (1):
39 e 46.
52. Turinsky AL, Razick S, Turner B, et al. Literature
curation of protein interactions: measuring agreement
across major public databases. Database (Oxford) ; 2010.
2010:baq026.
53. Orchard S, Kerrien S, Jones P, et al. Submit your
interaction data the IMEx way: a step by step guide to
trouble-free deposition. Proteomics 2007; 7 (Suppl. 1):
28 e 34.
54. Orchard S, Salwinski L, Kerrien S, et al. The minimum
information required for reporting a molecular inter-
action experiment (MIMIx). Nat Biotechnol 2007; 25 (8):
894 e 8.
55. Snel B, Lehmann G, Bork P, et al. STRING: a web-server
to retrieve and display the repeatedly occurring
neighbourhood of a gene. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28 (18):
3442 e 4.
56. Chaurasia G, Iqbal Y, Hanig C, et al. UniHI: an entry
gate to the human protein interactome. Nucleic Acids
Res 2007; 35 (Database issue):D590 e 4.
57. Turner B, Razick S, Turinsky AL, et al. iRefWeb:
interactive analysis of consolidated protein interaction
data and their supporting evidence. Database (Oxford) ;
2010. 2010:baq023.
58. Fields S, Song O. A novel genetic system to detect
protein e protein interactions. Nature 1989; 340 (6230):
245 e 6.
59. Bruckner A, Polge C, Lentze N, et al. Yeast two-hybrid,
a powerful tool for systems biology. Int J Mol Sci 2009;
10 (6):2763 e 88.

60. von Mering C, Krause R, Snel B, et al. Comparative
assessment of large-scale data sets of protein e protein
interactions. Nature 2002; 417 (6887):399 e 403.
61. Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R, et al. A comprehensive two-
hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein inter-
actome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98 (8):4569 e 74.
62. Kaake RM, Wang X, Huang L. Pro ling of protein

interaction networks of protein complexes using
af cation and quantitative mass spectrom-

etry. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010; 9 (8):1650 e 65.
63. Gustafsson E, Thoren K, Larsson T, et al. Identi

nity puri

cation
of proteins from Escherichia coli using two-dimensional
semi-preparative electrophoresis and mass spectrom-
etry. Rapid communications in mass spectrometry.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2001; 15 (6):428 e 32.
64. Das S, Bosley AD, Ye X, et al. Comparison of strong
cation exchange and SDS-PAGE fractionation for anal-
ysis of multiprotein complexes. J Proteome Res 2010;
9 (12):6696 e 704.
65. Bakalarski CE, Haas W, Dephoure NE, et al. The effects
of mass accuracy, data acquisition speed, and search
algorithm choice on peptide identi cation rates in

phosphoproteomics. Anal Bioanal Chem 2007; 389 (5):
1409 e 19.
66. Baker M. Proteomics: The interaction map. Nature 2012;
484 (7393):271 e 5.
67. Pardo M, Choudhary JS. Assignment of protein inter-
actions from af cation/mass spectrometry

data. J Proteome Res 2012; 11 (3):1462 e 74.
68. Trinkle-Mulcahy L, Boulon S, LamYW, et al. Identifying
speci

nity puri

c protein interaction partners using quantitative
mass spectrometry and bead proteomes. J Cell Biol 2008;
183 (2):223 e 39.
69. Boulon S, Ahmad Y, Trinkle-Mulcahy L, et al. Estab-
lishment of a protein frequency library and its appli-
cation in the reliable identi cation of speci c protein

interaction partners. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010; 9 (5):

861 e 79.
70. Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, et al. Stable isotope
labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as
a simple and accurate approach to expression proteo-
mics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2002; 1 (5):376 e 86.
71. Hubner NC, Mann M. Extracting gene function
from protein e protein interactions using Quantitative
BAC InteraCtomics (QUBIC). Methods 2011; 53 (4):

453 e 9.
72. Rinner O, Mueller LN, Hubalek M, et al. An integrated
mass spectrometric and computational framework for
the analysis of protein interaction networks. Nat
Biotechnol 2007; 25 (3):345 e 52.