Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
differentially regulated proteins in synaptosomes
of HIV/gp120 transgenic mice: Implications for
HIV-associated neurodegeneration.
Exp Neurol
2012;
236
62. Tebbe A, Schmidt A, Konstantinidis K, et al. Life-style
changes of a halophilic archaeon analyzed by quanti-
tative proteomics.
Proteomics
2009;
:3843
e
55.
63. Leroy B, Rosier C, Erculisse V, et al. Differential pro-
teomic analysis using isotope-coded protein-labeling
strategies: comparison, improvements and application
to simulated microgravity effect on Cupriavidus
metallidurans CH34.
Proteomics
2010;
9
:298
e
306.
49. Chen Z, Wang Q, Lin L, et al. Comparative evaluation
of two isobaric labeling tags, DiART and iTRAQ.
Anal
Chem
2012;
:2908
e
15.
50. Zeng D, Li S. Revival of deuterium-labeled reagents for
protein quantitation.
Chem Commun
2009;
84
:2281
e
91.
64. Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, et al. Quantitative analysis
of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded
af
10
:3369
e
71.
51. Zhang J, Wang Y, Li S. Deuterium isobaric amine-
reactive tags for quantitative proteomics.
Anal Chem
2010;
23
:994
e
9.
65. Hansen KC, Schmitt-Ulms G, Chalkley RJ, et al. Mass
spectrometric analysis of protein mixtures at
nity tags.
Nat Biotechnol
1999;
17
:7588
e
95.
52. Seo J, Suh MS, Thangadurai TD, et al. Mass-balanced
1H/2H isotope dipeptide tag for simultaneous protein
quantitation and identi
82
low
levels using cleavable 13C-isotope-coded af
nity tag
cation.
Anal Chem
2008;
80
:
and multidimensional
chromatography.
Mol Cell
6145
e
53.
53. Napoli A, Athanassopoulos CM, Moschidis P, et al.
Solid phase isobaric mass tag reagent for simultaneous
protein identi
:299
e
314.
66. Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, et al. Stable
isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC,
as a simple and accurate approach to expression pro-
teomics.
Mol Cell Proteomics
2002;
Proteomics
2003;
2
cation and assay.
Anal Chem
2010;
82
:
5552
e
60.
54. Xiang F, Ye H, Chen R, et al. N, N-dimethyl leucines
as novel isobaric tandem mass tags for quantitative
proteomics and peptidomics.
Anal Chem
2010;
1
:376
e
86.
67. Ong SE. The expanding
field of SILAC.
Anal Bioanal
Chem
; 2012.
68. Molina H, Yang Y, Ruch T, et al. Temporal pro
82
:
ling of
the adipocyte proteome during differentiation using
a
2817
e
25.
55. Ow SY, Salim M, Noirel J, et al. iTRAQ underestima-
tion in simple and complex mixtures:
five-plex SILAC based strategy.
J Proteome Res
2009;
“
:48
e
58.
69. Zhang G, Fenyo D, Neubert TA. Evaluation of the
variation in sample preparation for comparative pro-
teomics using stable isotope labeling by amino acids in
cell culture.
J Proteome Res
2009;
the good, the
8
:5347
e
55.
56. DeSouza LV, Romaschin AD, Colgan TJ, et al. Abso-
lute quanti
bad and the ugly.
”
J Proteome Res
2009;
8
cation of potential cancer markers in
clinical tissue homogenates using multiple reaction
monitoring on a hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion
trap tandem mass spectrometer.
Anal Chem
2009;
:1285
e
92.
70. Scholten A, Mohammed S, Low TY, et al. In-depth
quantitative cardiac proteomics combining electron
transfer dissociation and the metalloendopeptidase
Lys-N with the SILAC mouse.
Mol Cell Proteomics
2011;
8
:
81
3462
e
70.
57. DeSouza LV, Taylor AM, Li W, et al. Multiple reaction
monitoring of mTRAQ-labeled peptides
enables
:O111.008474.
71. Walther DM, Mann M. Accurate quanti
10
absolute quanti
cation of endogenous levels of
a potential cancer marker in cancerous and normal
endometrial tissues.
J Proteome Res
2008;
cation of
more than 4000 mouse tissue proteins reveals minimal
proteome changes during aging.
Mol Cell Proteomics
2011;
:3525
e
34.
58. Wang F, Chen R, Zhu J, et al. A fully automated
system with online sample loading, isotope dimethyl
labeling and multidimensional separation for high-
throughput quantitative proteome analysis.
Anal
Chem
2010;
7
:M110.004523.
72. Yu KH, Barry CG, Austin D, et al. Stable isotope
dilution multidimensional liquid chromatography-
tandem mass spectrometry for pancreatic cancer
serum biomarker discovery.
J Proteome Res
2009;
10
:3007
e
15.
59. Shi Y, Bajrami B, Yao X. Passive and active fragment
ion mass defect labeling: distinct proteomics potential
of iodine-based reagents.
Anal Chem
2009;
82
8
:
1565
e
76.
73. Shah SJ, Yu KH, Sangar V, et al. Identi
cation and
:6438
e
48.
60. Hsu J-L, Huang S-Y, Shiea J-T, et al. Beyond quanti-
tative proteomics: signal enhancement of the a1 ion as
a mass tag for peptide sequencing using dimethyl
labeling.
J Proteome Res
2005;
81
quanti
cation of preterm birth biomarkers in human
cervicovaginal
fluid by liquid chromatography/
tandem mass spectrometry.
J Proteome Res
2009;
8
:
2407
e
17.
74. Rangiah K, Tippornwong M, Sangar V, et al. Differ-
ential secreted proteome approach in murine model
for candidate biomarker discovery in colon cancer.
J Proteome Res
2009;
:101
e
8.
61. Schmidt A, Kellermann J, Lottspeich F. A novel
strategy for quantitative proteomics using isotope-
coded protein labels.
Proteomics
2005;
4
:4
e
15.
:5153
e
64.
5
8
Search WWH ::
Custom Search