Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
is critical. In a bottom-up approach, all identi
ed
phosphorylated peptides will be grouped into
a single protein sequence, making it impossible
to readily differentiate active and inactive popu-
lations. In top-down proteomics, the intact
proteins themselves are measured, allowing
eachmodi
proteins will precipitate out under conditions
used for reversed-phase chromatography.
Reversed-phase separations of intact proteins
do not exhibit the high resolution that peptides
do, nor do they give the same quality peak shape;
therefore, tools such as monolithic columns may
be necessary for top-down protein identi
ed variant to produce a unique signal.
Therefore, the various modi
cation.
Top-down proteomics has existed for several
years; Kelleher recently published a study that
illustrates the tremendous potential of this tech-
nology for characterizing proteomes. 7 A four-
dimensional
ed versions of the
protein can be accurately assigned.
The primary advantage of top-down MS is
that the molecular weight of the intact protein
is experimentally measured; therefore, the
contributions from each amino acid are recorded
in one signal. However, the mass of the intact
protein is insuf
separation
system comprised
sequentially
isoelectric
focusing,
gel-eluted
liquid fraction
entrapment
electrophoresis,
cient to identify an unknown
protein, even with the high mass measurement
accuracy instruments used today. The protein
must be fragmented similar to peptides analyzed
using MS 2 . For intact proteins, electron-capture
dissociation (ECD) and electron-transfer dissoci-
ation (ETD) are two methods that have demon-
strated excellent promise in fragmenting intact
proteins. Unfortunately, the sensitivity of identi-
fying intact proteins via top-down approaches is
not as great as bottom-up approaches for
peptides. Top-down fragmentation methods
produce a larger number of lower intensity frag-
ments than CID of peptides; therefore, one or
two orders of magnitude more material
nanocapillary
liquid chromatography,
and
finally MS was used to identify more than
3,093 proteins within human cells via top-
down proteomics. The identi
ed proteins origi-
nated from 1,043 gene products, with the
proteins originating from the same gene having
been processing via different PTMs, RNA
splicing, and proteolysis events. Proteins greater
than 100,000 Da in molecular weight and
membrane proteins containing 11 transmem-
brane helices were identi
ed. Being able to iden-
tify more than 3,000 proteins brings top-down
proteomics into the same arena as bottom-up
methods and suggests that in the near future,
measuring intact proteins at this scale will
contribute to a fuller and more accurate blue-
print of the proteins encoded within the human
genome.
is
required
for
intact
protein
identi
cation
compared to typical peptide identi
cation.
Although development in MS technology is
critical for optimizing top-down protein identifi-
-
cation, continuing improvements in sample
preparation steps are also necessary. Protein
solubility is very important. In bottom-up identi-
METABOLITE IDENTIFICATION IN
GLOBAL METABOLOMICS
fication, proteins are reduced to peptides that
overall are more soluble than intact proteins.
Because membrane proteins have much different
solubility requirements than those within the
cytosol, conditions must be established that will
solubilize as much as the proteome as possible.
In addition, although peptides are readily frac-
tionated using a variety of chromatographic
techniques, a signi
Mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic
resonance (NMR) spectroscopy are the two
most widely used techniques for the analysis of
the metabolome. Global metabolomics is a study
that relies on the detection, identi
cation, and
quantitation of as many metabolites as analyti-
cally possible in biological samples in search of
variations that can be used to discriminate
cant percentage of
intact
Search WWH ::




Custom Search